Re^5: How to implement a fourth protocol

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: How to implement a fourth protocol by Moron (Curate) on Mar 30, 2007 at 10:42 UTC
A very superficial analysis - that kind of attitude doesn't solve the problems that exist and therefore does not protect investment at all. It can also mean you fail to take control over your responsibilities. -M Free your mind	[reply]
Re^7: How to implement a fourth protocol by Argel (Prior) on Mar 30, 2007 at 21:45 UTC
You claim you are doing all of this to save time and money on your project but you do not even realize just how deep these waters you are treading into are! And because of that you are likely to have the opposite effect. But you do not want to hear that. In fact, you know you are right so you will actually respond to posts that conflict with your world view in a condescending and hostile manner as indicated by Re^6: How to implement a fourth protocol, Re^8: How to implement a fourth protocol, Re^2: How to implement a fourth protocol, Re^4: How to implement a fourth protocol, and Re^6: How to implement a fourth protocol. Or at least that's the impression your posts leave me with. You keep talking about managing risk but the one thing you are not doing is managing how much risk you yourself are posing to your projects. In this case you do not know enough about networking and security to make a sound judgment. You need to defer to others with more expertise.	[reply]
Re^8: How to implement a fourth protocol by Moron (Curate) on Apr 02, 2007 at 10:05 UTC
Sound judgement comes from thorough analysis, not by deferring without understanding what you are doing. I challenge other posts if they seem to draw conclusions too rashly or to get more info. -M Free your mind	[reply]
Re^9: How to implement a fourth protocol by Argel (Prior) on Apr 02, 2007 at 19:15 UTC
Re^10: How to implement a fourth protocol by Moron (Curate) on Apr 03, 2007 at 12:08 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here