Re: auto generating wrapper classes for complex types defined in WSDL

I was going to mention stubmaker.pl, but you said you wanted something more. If you go through examples that http://www.soaplite.com/ provides, you'll see it is actually pretty straightforward to handle this on your own. The site is actually pretty good about docs.

Comment on Re: auto generating wrapper classes for complex types defined in WSDL

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: auto generating wrapper classes for complex types defined in WSDL by cwilliams (Novice) on Oct 10, 2007 at 21:55 UTC
FYI, I posted the original question, but cookie problems conspired to make it post as anon. Yes, stubmaker just generates a wrapper to make the calls easier. The results still just returns nested hashes for complex data types. I'm looking for something that would generate classes that could be used instead of the nested hashes. One class per complex type with get/set methods to access the members of that complex type. Or something like that. I haven't been able to find anything like this among the SOAP::Lite docs. I hadn't seen the soaplite.com site before, but a quick glance doesn't find anything new. I will certainly browse some more to see if there is something I can use.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: auto generating wrapper classes for complex types defined in WSDL
by cwilliams (Novice) on Oct 10, 2007 at 21:55 UTC

FYI, I posted the original question, but cookie problems conspired to make it post as anon. Yes, stubmaker just generates a wrapper to make the calls easier. The results still just returns nested hashes for complex data types. I'm looking for something that would generate classes that could be used instead of the nested hashes. One class per complex type with get/set methods to access the members of that complex type. Or something like that. I haven't been able to find anything like this among the SOAP::Lite docs. I hadn't seen the soaplite.com site before, but a quick glance doesn't find anything new. I will certainly browse some more to see if there is something I can use.

[reply]