dragonchild, yeah, I assume they will already be sold on C::A, so maybe I should just reference your excellent nodes if they are still unsure. My rationale section is a little weak, I admit, but more directed at coders like myself. Maybe the rationale part should be dropped altogether.
—Brad
"The important work of moving the world forward does not wait to be done by perfect men." George Eliot
| [reply] |
If you want to drop it, that's fine. At least reference good rationales and say something like "I assume you're have already decided. If you haven't, go here, here, and here."
My criteria for good software:
- Does it work?
- Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?
| [reply] |