Re^2: Draft of CGI::Application Tutorial for review

in reply to Re: Draft of CGI::Application Tutorial for review
in thread Draft of CGI::Application Tutorial -- RFC

dragonchild, yeah, I assume they will already be sold on C::A, so maybe I should just reference your excellent nodes if they are still unsure. My rationale section is a little weak, I admit, but more directed at coders like myself. Maybe the rationale part should be dropped altogether.

—Brad
"The important work of moving the world forward does not wait to be done by perfect men." George Eliot

Comment on Re^2: Draft of CGI::Application Tutorial for review

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Draft of CGI::Application Tutorial for review by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jul 17, 2008 at 00:54 UTC
If you want to drop it, that's fine. At least reference good rationales and say something like "I assume you're have already decided. If you haven't, go here, here, and here." My criteria for good software: Does it work? Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?	[reply]

In Section Meditations