in reply to Re: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever
in thread My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever

the documentation is expecting you to be a relatively intelligent person.

OOh! That is soo wrong.

Who should I select? Um. How about Kofi Annan; or Alexandra Kosteniuk; or Thomas C. Schelling; or Steven Hawking; I wonder if any of them are intelligent enough to have used a debugger?


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."
  • Comment on Re^2: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 21, 2008 at 18:40 UTC

    If they have a need to read the debugger's documentation, I presume they have some degree of interest in the subject, yes.

      If it's their first time using a debugger, interest or not, they are very unlikely to know what a "watch" is in this context. It doesn't mean they lack intelligence, just specific knowledge. And that's when they are going to go looking at the documentation...


      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
      If they have a need to read the debugger's documentation, I presume they expect the documentation to tell them how things work, not say "well, duh!".

      Intelligence obviously has nothing to do with prior knowledge.

      /J