in reply to Re^2: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever
in thread My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever

If they have a need to read the debugger's documentation, I presume they have some degree of interest in the subject, yes.

  • Comment on Re^3: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 21, 2008 at 22:45 UTC

    If it's their first time using a debugger, interest or not, they are very unlikely to know what a "watch" is in this context. It doesn't mean they lack intelligence, just specific knowledge. And that's when they are going to go looking at the documentation...


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^4: My nomination for the worst sentence in Perl documentation ever
by jplindstrom (Monsignor) on Aug 22, 2008 at 13:04 UTC
    If they have a need to read the debugger's documentation, I presume they expect the documentation to tell them how things work, not say "well, duh!".

    Intelligence obviously has nothing to do with prior knowledge.

    /J