in reply to ++ & -- & :-( users

another problem is that .. if you are the one asking the question, and someone responds - but you don't quite understand their response or have questions about it - how can you message the user and ask them further.. without writing another post? Also in a long thread.. it'd be nice to see whose replying to who..

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: ++ & -- & :-( users
by little (Curate) on Apr 11, 2001 at 03:04 UTC
    Isn't it better to reply to the replier when his answer is not clear to you? Wouln't that more help others reading the thread? Replies should only be made to the node you want to reply to. So whether you reply to the root node or to a node of the thread (and all of them have their own little reply link next right to them). So your argument is not very strong, eh? But don't worry, mine is neither.

    All I want is not ++ & -- & :-(
    but
    I want perl & wisdom & :-)

    So I guess all I want is CONTENT?
    And if hiding the authors name does support that then it's welcome to me.

    Have a nice day
    All decision is left to your taste
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion