in reply to packages within packages

2 questions:

I have to admit to self-interest in the answer to this question, since it rather looks as though I'm attempting to achieve the same thing...

Update:

Just noticed the scoping of the strictures, you might want to move them into the RemoteException package/class and maybe even copy them into the subclasses, so that they do you some good:-)

A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: packages within packages
by shmem (Chancellor) on Jan 23, 2009 at 16:13 UTC

    The strictures are pragmas and lexically scoped. The scope (BLOCK) in which they appear is file level, so they apply through all code from there to the rest of the file, if not countered somewhere with a no statement.

[reply]
      Hi shmem, long time no speak.

      I take your point - which I assumed to be as you state, however, I recall encountering a situation whereby I used strictures at the top of a multi-package file but found that I also had to use strictures within each individual package in order to gain the substantial benefits therefrom - ever since I've always included strictures in every package.

      .oO(Maybe it's time to review the situation)

      A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom