Re^2: packages within packages

The strictures are pragmas and lexically scoped. The scope (BLOCK) in which they appear is file level, so they apply through all code from there to the rest of the file, if not countered somewhere with a no statement.

Comment on Re^2: packages within packages

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: packages within packages by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Jan 23, 2009 at 16:28 UTC
Hi shmem, long time no speak. I take your point - which I assumed to be as you state, however, I recall encountering a situation whereby I used strictures at the top of a multi-package file but found that I also had to use strictures within each individual package in order to gain the substantial benefits therefrom - ever since I've always included strictures in every package. .oO(Maybe it's time to review the situation) A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: packages within packages
by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Jan 23, 2009 at 16:28 UTC

shmem

I take your point - which I assumed to be as you state, however, I recall encountering a situation whereby I used strictures at the top of a multi-package file but found that I also had to use strictures within each individual package in order to gain the substantial benefits therefrom - ever since I've always included strictures in every package.

.oO(Maybe it's time to review the situation)

A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))

[reply]