in reply to Missing perlmonks

SilasTheMonk:

parv++ has it right: If you have a clear subject line, and prefix it with "OT:", few people are going to complain. I can't speak for others, but the times I get annoyed about OT nodes are when the subject line suggests an interesting perl question, when the body contains something completely different. It's much easier to ignore posts you don't care about or can't answer if properly labeled.

If the world were a perfect place, I'd love to off-topic nodes titled something like "OT (Windows): How to schedule a job?" or similar, so I have a reasonable chance of selecting appropriate nodes to read.

...roboticus

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Missing perlmonks
by SilasTheMonk (Chaplain) on Apr 04, 2009 at 13:20 UTC

    As I predicted I did not get a reply so far on that forum. In fact it has only be viewed twice. Also I managed to solve it myself by looking at the code of the offending module. Who needs documentation?

    On the subject of off-topic posts, I think I would have been quite quick to vote down the post that I would have made. The "OT" prefix would not have helped as I had not realized what "OT" stood for.