Re^2: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?!

Got it. _Now_ it seems sooo obvious :)

Many thanks!

Krambambuli
---

Comment on Re^2: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?! by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 20, 2009 at 16:37 UTC
`split(/pat/, $s, -1)` is the same as `split(/pat/, $s)` except trailing fields aren't discarded.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?! by Krambambuli (Curate) on May 21, 2009 at 14:19 UTC
Ah, great! Thanks, that's something I didn't actually realize as such from the manpage. Krambambuli ---	[reply]