Re^3: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?!

split(/pat/, $s, -1) is the same as split(/pat/, $s) except trailing fields aren't discarded.

Comment on Re^3: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?! Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Is this expected behavior for chomp/split...?! by Krambambuli (Curate) on May 21, 2009 at 14:19 UTC
Ah, great! Thanks, that's something I didn't actually realize as such from the manpage. Krambambuli ---	[reply]