Re^2: Capture all the packets

I'm not sure what exactly you are suggesting. The question you linked to has no replies and is from another forum several years ago. While on the same topic, the questions are not worded the same in fact, IMHO the post you link to is slightly better written than the this question :)

This is perhaps a relatively common question, or at any rate, a question I’ve seen asked here several times.

Or are you suggesting that the approval and reply by two separate monks (or are you suggesting this is the same person?), perhaps from the same geographic region is part of some sort of XP scam?

I'm not trying to upset anyone, I just don't follow exactly what is being suggested here.

The previous example of plagiarism you linked to was in response to various repeated 'offences', where the posts made here could be found (in some cases verbatim) as posts elsewhere on the web. In those cases it wasn't it poetry rather than questions that were being plagiarised?

Cheers,

Martin

Comment on Re^2: Capture all the packets

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Capture all the packets by GrandFather (Saint) on Jun 08, 2009 at 12:07 UTC
The OP has replied to the effect that he cross posted here because replies weren't forthcoming from the other site. Waiting 4 years for a reply seems patient beyond belief! Actually, having had a look at a few more of the questions and replies of a few of the individuals concerned I don't think there is a lot of plagiarism, but more a concerted series of 'sock puppet' questions and of course the already highlighted front paging frenzy. True laziness is hard work	[reply]
Re^4: Capture all the packets by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 08, 2009 at 14:27 UTC
"Nothing wrong in this,I haven't got proper result on that site,I thought that I will get the proper output in this site" I am not convinced that the OP is stating they posted on this other site, just that they have not found the answer they are looking for there. I get the impression by "Nothing wrong in this," that they are not the author of the post on the other forum, and have done nothing wrong by posting here. I have no reason not to believe them, or associate their post here with the one on that other forum. Cheers, Martin	[reply]
Re^4: Capture all the packets by targetsmart (Curate) on Jun 08, 2009 at 15:10 UTC
4 years before he was new to computers, he wouldn't know what was a packet though No 'sock puppet' stuff, i am sure, the problem is that they are all new, they are slowly learning to use the site. already highlighted front paging frenzy for me it took a long time to understand this site, for them too (from a similar background, undergone same training, same years of experience, same environment, same nix tools, etc, etc) it will take time for soaking in this site, do's and dont's, policies/guidelines*, people/monks, etc. but they will learn quickly, we need to help them, rather than suspecting them I think un-necessary suspicion on those people, will make them feel bad and low, it will in-turn make them feel bad about the society and this site, they will finally start to hate perl too! (already we saw that post Re^2: Capture all the packets). so I am here to support and help all those guys, in terms of do's and dont's and use of this site, etc. soon they will be one of the best monks on this site, they will one day become great grand father :-)) I introduced perlmonks site to all of them when i mentored perl course for them as a part of their training curriculum in my previous company, they all love perl, they all use perl. we shouldn't hurt them even if we are not helping them. I know you are one of the responsible monks in this site, so I explained this to you clearly Vivek -- In accordance with the prarabdha of each, the One whose function it is to ordain makes each to act. What will not happen will never happen, whatever effort one may put forth. And what will happen will not fail to happen, however much one may seek to prevent it. This is certain. The part of wisdom therefore is to stay quiet.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.