in reply to RE: RE: RE: RE: This, too, was wasted on my wife.
in thread This, too, was wasted on my wife.
It's not supposed to be obfusicated, hence it's inclusion in "Craft."
Sorry, it sucks even worse as "Craft" than as "obfuscated". Indeed, it's hard to envision any possible intent for the code above than as "obfu". The fact that it prints JAPH is quite the giveaway. The fact that isn't particularly novel or obfuscated is pretty irrelevant.
|
|---|