RE: RE: RE: RE: This, too, was wasted on my wife.

It's not supposed to be obfusicated, hence it's inclusion in "Craft."

As to the similarity to a previously posted node, please include the link as I would be interested in seeing it.

Thanks!

Addendum
If My first attempt at obfuscation is it, I did see it (and even voted++).

I agree that it is somewhat similar. Perhaps your code imbeded itself in my subconscious.

Comment on RE: RE: RE: RE: This, too, was wasted on my wife.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: This, too, was wasted on my wife. by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 15, 2009 at 19:00 UTC
It's not supposed to be obfusicated, hence it's inclusion in "Craft." Sorry, it sucks even worse as "Craft" than as "obfuscated". Indeed, it's hard to envision any possible intent for the code above than as "obfu". The fact that it prints JAPH is quite the giveaway. The fact that isn't particularly novel or obfuscated is pretty irrelevant. Between the mind which plans and the hands which build, there must be a mediator... and this mediator must be the heart.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: This, too, was wasted on my wife.
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 15, 2009 at 19:00 UTC

It's not supposed to be obfusicated, hence it's inclusion in "Craft."

Sorry, it sucks even worse as "Craft" than as "obfuscated". Indeed, it's hard to envision any possible intent for the code above than as "obfu". The fact that it prints JAPH is quite the giveaway. The fact that isn't particularly novel or obfuscated is pretty irrelevant.

Between the mind which plans and the hands which build, there must be a mediator... and this mediator must be the heart.

[reply]