Re^2: freaky deaky plus sign usage

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: freaky deaky plus sign usage by Anonymous Monk on Jul 31, 2009 at 19:23 UTC
No, the return value from Mock::Basic->update() is numified (if it had a 0+ overload, it gets called). CSJewell, I just don't want to log in atm.	[reply]
Re^4: freaky deaky plus sign usage by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Aug 01, 2009 at 02:31 UTC
The search terms above don't seem to match any node. Anyone got a clue?	[reply]
Re^5: freaky deaky plus sign usage by JadeNB (Chaplain) on Aug 01, 2009 at 17:11 UTC
Probably he/she/it just misplaced a bracket, typing `[CSJewell, I just don't ...]` in place of `[CSJewell], I just don't ...`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: freaky deaky plus sign usage by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Aug 02, 2009 at 06:03 UTC
Re^7: freaky deaky plus sign usage by JadeNB (Chaplain) on Aug 03, 2009 at 01:39 UTC
Re^4: freaky deaky plus sign usage by Anonymous Monk on Aug 02, 2009 at 15:36 UTC
unary-plus does NOT numify. `0+` does not get called. - ikegami	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: freaky deaky plus sign usage by Anonymous Monk on Aug 01, 2009 at 02:58 UTC
`perl -MCGI -MTest::More -e " ok 1; ok +CGI->new, +CGI->new; ok scalar +CGI->new; ok( CGI->new ); ok CGI->new; " ok 1 ok 2 - CGI=HASH(0x1a08a30) ok 3 ok 4 Undefined subroutine CGI::ok at -e line 1 # Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not s +een.` [download]	[reply] [d/l]