Re^2: What are the criterias of a "good" Perl IDE?

in reply to Re: What are the criterias of a "good" Perl IDE?
in thread What are the criterias of a "good" Perl IDE?

Like in this image ?

So you mean you prefer the error/diagnostic message and error line blended together instead of having both in separate subwindows?

UPDATE: The technical term for this is "bubble text", right?

Cheers Rolf

Comment on Re^2: What are the criterias of a "good" Perl IDE?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: What are the criterias of a "good" Perl IDE? by BioLion (Curate) on Aug 15, 2009 at 13:08 UTC
Yes - the bubbletext is what i meant - call me simple but i like it when all that information is integrated, but without being too intrusive, The best example being the on-the-fly error checking i think. Just a something something...	[reply]
Re^4: What are the criterias of a "good" Perl IDE? by LanX (Saint) on Aug 15, 2009 at 14:33 UTC
No I don't call you simple it's just ergonomic if you don't have to move your eye up and down to see which errortext is associated to which errorline (though both highlighted). IMHO thats comparable to the convenience of syntax-highlighting ... (It's the first Eclipse feature so far where I am not sure how to achieve it with Emacs ... hmm maybe with popper.el) Cheers Rolf	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom