vit has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Did anybody use Win32::IEAutomation for web application testing purposes. How is it vs QTP or similar tools in terms of capabilities. Of course I am talking about test programming, not "record and replay" crappy stuff.
  • Comment on Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools
by marto (Cardinal) on Jan 08, 2010 at 14:55 UTC
      Thanks, I had a quick look and they all seems to be about the same stuff and can be used I guess in combination. Whatever works, right?

      So, do you think QTP and similar tools could be completely replaced by using perl with these modules?

        I've never used QuickTest Professional, or any of the other HP testing tools, so I can't offer a comparison. Selenium seems to be a reasonable offering, though perhaps overkill depending on exactly what you want to test.

Re: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools
by planetscape (Chancellor) on Jan 08, 2010 at 15:03 UTC
Re: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 08, 2010 at 14:47 UTC
    Of course I am talking about test programming, not "record and replay" crappy stuff.

    What is the difference?