Re^2: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools

Thanks, I had a quick look and they all seems to be about the same stuff and can be used I guess in combination. Whatever works, right?

So, do you think QTP and similar tools could be completely replaced by using perl with these modules?

Comment on Re^2: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools by marto (Cardinal) on Jan 08, 2010 at 15:10 UTC
I've never used QuickTest Professional, or any of the other HP testing tools, so I can't offer a comparison. Selenium seems to be a reasonable offering, though perhaps overkill depending on exactly what you want to test.	[reply]
Re^4: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools by vit (Friar) on Jan 08, 2010 at 15:23 UTC
I need things like start browsers, get and process html, get and process text from the page (from HTML, JavaScript, AJAX), click buttons and links, fill out forms, select drop-downs, etc. and of course use the full perl power of Reg Ext, text processing, logic, etc	[reply]
Re^5: Win32::IEAutomation vs. QTP or similar tools by marto (Cardinal) on Jan 08, 2010 at 15:27 UTC
Sounds like Limbic~Regions tutorial Using WWW::Selenium To Test Or Automate An Ajax Website, planetscape and I already mentioned would suit you down to the ground.	[reply]