Re^2: For valid HTML (styling)

One can no longer put CSS in one's own home node to control how the node looks to other people. Note that CSS can be used to remove or replace basic navigation and/or basic user information (the reporting of which is an important part of the function of home nodes).

Given that several people have already demonstrated their willingness to use CSS to interfere with basic functions of their home node, I don't see the privilege to include CSS being restored. If we had a simple way to filter CSS so that simple styling could be allowed without allowing disruptive uses of CSS, that might make a difference.

- tye

Comment on Re^2: For valid HTML (styling)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: For valid HTML (styling) by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 09, 2010 at 18:58 UTC
ah, tye, you interpreted her "profile" as homenode. That makes sense. If that's the case, then she must be talking about stuff she did a long time ago indeed. I'd say there's a certain "statute of limitations" on such changes; her opportunity to complain has long since passed. What is the sound of Windows? Is it not the sound of a wall upon which people have smashed their heads... all the way through?	[reply]
Re^4: For valid HTML (styling) by Lady_Aleena (Priest) on Apr 11, 2010 at 04:52 UTC
jdporter, tye is correct in his assessment of my request. I was talking about the styles on my homenode, a.k.a. profile, to make it more readable by others. I had a splash of color and a couple of things floating. Now it is just a jumble. I added that request at the tail end of the HTML message just 'cause. One never knows when something taken away for a good reason could be allowed again, maybe in a limited fashion. It is not that big a deal, or I would have been quite a bit more eloquent about it. :) *Have a nice day!* Lady Aleena	[reply]