Re^3: For valid HTML (styling)

ah, tye, you interpreted her "profile" as homenode. That makes sense. If that's the case, then she must be talking about stuff she did a long time ago indeed. I'd say there's a certain "statute of limitations" on such changes; her opportunity to complain has long since passed.

What is the sound of Windows? Is it not the sound of a wall upon which people have smashed their heads... all the way through?

Comment on Re^3: For valid HTML (styling)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: For valid HTML (styling) by Lady_Aleena (Priest) on Apr 11, 2010 at 04:52 UTC
jdporter, tye is correct in his assessment of my request. I was talking about the styles on my homenode, a.k.a. profile, to make it more readable by others. I had a splash of color and a couple of things floating. Now it is just a jumble. I added that request at the tail end of the HTML message just 'cause. One never knows when something taken away for a good reason could be allowed again, maybe in a limited fashion. It is not that big a deal, or I would have been quite a bit more eloquent about it. :) *Have a nice day!* Lady Aleena	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: For valid HTML (styling)
by Lady_Aleena (Priest) on Apr 11, 2010 at 04:52 UTC

jdporter, tye is correct in his assessment of my request. I was talking about the styles on my homenode, a.k.a. profile, to make it more readable by others. I had a splash of color and a couple of things floating. Now it is just a jumble.

I added that request at the tail end of the HTML message just 'cause. One never knows when something taken away for a good reason could be allowed again, maybe in a limited fashion. It is not that big a deal, or I would have been quite a bit more eloquent about it. :)

Have a nice day!

Lady Aleena

[reply]