in reply to Re^2: using perlsyntax for other languages?
in thread using perlsyntax for other languages?

I didn't mention B:CC???

Since my intention is not to emulate perl but to reuse perl syntax with foreign semantics

So you want a Perl tokenizer or parser. On both counts, the answer is PPI.

Update: Mentioned PPI.
Update: Mentioned tokenizer.

  • Comment on Re^3: using perlsyntax for other languages?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: using perlsyntax for other languages?
by LanX (Saint) on Apr 16, 2010 at 16:37 UTC
    >I didn't mention B:CC???

    No you didn't ... I did !x3

    BTW: To which version of your updates am I supposed to answer?

    Cheers Rolf

[reply]
[d/l]

      No you didn't ... I did !x3

      Seriously?

      My point is that my question still stands as you replied with something unrelated.

      What's your point? (x2)

      To which version of your updates am I supposed to answer?

      Since each was a superset of the previous, does it matter? Reply to whichever part you want. =

[reply]
        Honestly you have the tendance to answer without really reading the question, maybe due to your high output of posts?

        My first reply was a detailed repetition of the OP....

        But I have the strong impression you just want to repeat your usual "Perl can't be compiled to C" protocol.

        > Since each was a superset of the previous, does it matter?

        No it wasn't, you were talking about implicit numification of scalars...

        You usually demand to flag significant updates, so do I. Please!

        whatever ....

        I'm not in the mode for flaming and I already have promising results hacking B::Deparse

        Thanks!

        Cheers Rolf

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom