in reply to Re^2: Out of date over <> and 5.10
in thread Out of date over <> and 5.10

Am I missing something? You say "Huh?", but you seem to not suffer from the problem either.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Out of date over <> and 5.10
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 08, 2010 at 04:29 UTC

    You said you; "thought it was a thing of the past", indicating that it is (still?) a problem?

    I think the problem--when it existed--was more a problem with the way perl assocs were set up (by AS)--not a fundamental issue with Windows redirection.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

      You said you; "thought it was a thing of the past", indicating that it is (still?) a problem?

      It happened to the OP.

      I think the problem--when it existed--was more a problem with the way perl assocs were set up (by AS)--not a fundamental issue with Windows redirection.

      Lots of people are/were missing the %1 in their association. That's a different problem. It works fine for the OP when he provides an argument. It's when he redirects STDIN that he has a problem.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom