Re^4: Out of date over <> and 5.10

You said you; "thought it was a thing of the past", indicating that it is (still?) a problem?

I think the problem--when it existed--was more a problem with the way perl assocs were set up (by AS)--not a fundamental issue with Windows redirection.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

RIP an inspiration; A true Folk's Guy

Comment on Re^4: Out of date over <> and 5.10

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Out of date over <> and 5.10 by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 08, 2010 at 14:26 UTC
You said you; "thought it was a thing of the past", indicating that it is (still?) a problem? It happened to the OP. I think the problem--when it existed--was more a problem with the way perl assocs were set up (by AS)--not a fundamental issue with Windows redirection. Lots of people are/were missing the %1 in their association. That's a different problem. It works fine for the OP when he provides an argument. It's when he redirects STDIN that he has a problem.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Out of date over <> and 5.10
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 08, 2010 at 14:26 UTC

You said you; "thought it was a thing of the past", indicating that it is (still?) a problem?

It happened to the OP.

I think the problem--when it existed--was more a problem with the way perl assocs were set up (by AS)--not a fundamental issue with Windows redirection.

Lots of people are/were missing the %1 in their association. That's a different problem. It works fine for the OP when he provides an argument. It's when he redirects STDIN that he has a problem.

[reply]