in reply to Re^4: Unexpected HTML from POD
in thread Unexpected HTML from POD
OK it's not a classical bug ... :)
... but there is no "missing documentation reporting system" so you'll have to rely on bug reporting.
(sorry I assumed perlbug is well known)
IMHO you could even suggest an extended POD text and attach a diff, if you want.
Cheers Rolf
UPDATE: I'm still not sure if an unspecified feature isn't a bug. If other well known POD parser like Pod::POM don't implement it, because the authors don't know about it, it's a real problem!
|
|---|