in reply to Re^3: Unexpected HTML from POD
in thread Unexpected HTML from POD

I hadn't planned to, since the behaviour was clearly intended. If you think it would help, I shall gladly do so if I can work out the intricacies and identity of the bug reporting system.

Regards,

John Davies

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Unexpected HTML from POD
by toolic (Bishop) on Jan 13, 2011 at 00:53 UTC
    identity of the bug reporting system
    perlbug, assuming you want to report on a Core module/utlitity, such as Pod::Html or pod2html.
[reply]
Re^5: Unexpected HTML from POD
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 13, 2011 at 01:30 UTC
    > I hadn't planned to, since the behaviour was clearly intended. If you think it would help, I shall gladly do so...

    OK it's not a classical bug ... :)

    ... but there is no "missing documentation reporting system" so you'll have to rely on bug reporting.

    (sorry I assumed perlbug is well known)

    IMHO you could even suggest an extended POD text and attach a diff, if you want.

    Cheers Rolf

    UPDATE: I'm still not sure if an unspecified feature isn't a bug. If other well known POD parser like Pod::POM don't implement it, because the authors don't know about it, it's a real problem!

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom