Re^3: Unexpected HTML from POD

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Unexpected HTML from POD by davies (Monsignor) on Jan 13, 2011 at 00:18 UTC
I hadn't planned to, since the behaviour was clearly intended. If you think it would help, I shall gladly do so if I can work out the intricacies and identity of the bug reporting system. Regards, John Davies	[reply]
Re^5: Unexpected HTML from POD by toolic (Bishop) on Jan 13, 2011 at 00:53 UTC
identity of the bug reporting system perlbug, assuming you want to report on a Core module/utlitity, such as Pod::Html or pod2html.	[reply]
Re^5: Unexpected HTML from POD by LanX (Saint) on Jan 13, 2011 at 01:30 UTC
> I hadn't planned to, since the behaviour was clearly intended. If you think it would help, I shall gladly do so... OK it's not a classical bug ... :) ... but there is no "missing documentation reporting system" so you'll have to rely on bug reporting. (sorry I assumed perlbug is well known) IMHO you could even suggest an extended POD text and attach a diff, if you want. Cheers Rolf UPDATE: I'm still not sure if an unspecified feature isn't a bug. If other well known POD parser like Pod::POM don't implement it, because the authors don't know about it, it's a real problem!	[reply]