Look you loser,
Yipes! Major, major bad wei wu for that!
Let me explain carefully what I did. First I searched with quotes around the error string. I maintain that when one wants to find information about a specific error message that one must include the quotes so as to immediately filter out the extraneous hits that would otherwise match things like ssh. (Cluebat: In this context all those links out there that mention ssh in some random context are noise.) This search yielded two (2) hits (as mentioned above), both of which were for the OPs original node (one directly to the node, the other via SoPW).
Next I did it your way (sans quotes), which turned up 15k+ hits. The top hit there is to an html-ized rendering of the Net::OpenSSH sources. Of course this error message is there, but we already knew that, as the OP was kind enough to tell us that this error message was provided by the module in question. The next two hits are for the root node of this thread; the next is the one where you start calling me names, and the rest go off into that nether world of random links about ssh. As the question posed by the OP is about an error message from Net::OpenSSH, hoping to find something useful in those links seems like a waste of time.
The answer is in the first page of numerous links.
Well, then, if you're willing to be truly helpful and demonstrate some of your superior intelligence, please point to the specific
google result that has you throwing fits like
You shouldn't be a programmer, you always check for string quoting errors in failed searches.... the class is called "Try_Harder_101"
I'm willing to learn the error(s) of my ways. Are you willing to teach? Or are you going to continue with the bovine birthing rituals?
| [reply] |
The only thing bovine happening here is your mindless belligerence. zentara has been here for years helping others. I don't see where you've done anything at all.
zentara++
| [reply] |
Oooohh, them's fightin' words. Mindless belligerence, indeed. Tell me, kind sir, how a careful explanation of what I did along with a heart-felt request for critique from TheMaster is mindless (the belligerence part being subject to debate).
| [reply] |
Hello Anonymousmonk,
Does this mean I'm not getting a check from you next week? bwahaha
Never come to a place for free handouts, then complain that the handouts are not good enough for you. Bad wu wei.
from your first response to me
Oh, my stars... Another totally useless reply from one of the GreatMinds at PerlMonks. ...and onward from there. It seems you are going way way out of your way to attack us, for not giving you an answer. Or maybe this is part of a psyche test?
All I can say, is may all the animosity you generate, be turned back to you. Hopefully into your first ulcer. I am sort of glad that you personally can't find the answer, I think the universe wants it that way. You deserve your ignorant state.
By the way, if you want me to give infallible answers, make me Pope bwahaha
| [reply] |
Let's be clear(er) hear. I did not come here asking for
anything. I am not the OP, though you have implied that I am. On the
contrary, I pointed out that I thought your reply was
somewhat insufficient.
We are now full circle on this and as far as I'm concerned we're
done. I asked for explanation of what you found that I missed and you
are unwilling to offer an answer. There is no us aspect to
my posts here. I am not attacking all of PM. I am pointing out
that (IMO) you provided an inusfficient answer to a
well-formulated question. When you stick to your comfort zone,
the answers are unsurpassed, but when you stray, the quality
deteriorates rapidly.
| [reply] |