Re^5: OOSheets modifying read-only value

Aww, sorry. I have iconv on my Windoxs systems and I *thought* Alien::Iconv installed them. Obviously not.

Here is a link to pre-compiled binaries of Iconv for Windows systems.

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

Comment on Re^5: OOSheets modifying read-only value Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: OOSheets modifying read-only value by plechazunga (Novice) on Mar 26, 2011 at 19:40 UTC
OK, I finally have time to try to follow up on this. I should've mentioned in my OP that my Windows is 64-bit, which I presume is the reason why trying to install the Gnu32 link hasn't solved the problem (tried installing wget, too, to similar success). I'm I stuck until a 64-bit iconv is released?	[reply]
Re^7: OOSheets modifying read-only value by CountZero (Bishop) on Mar 26, 2011 at 22:06 UTC
There is a 64-bit version of MinGW that includes Iconv: http://www.drangon.org/mingw/ I didn't try it as I have no 64bit Windows version. CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James	[reply]
Re^7: OOSheets modifying read-only value by Anonymous Monk on Mar 26, 2011 at 22:15 UTC
I'm I stuck until a 64-bit iconv is released? You're stuck forever :) gnuwin32 iconv was released in 2004 , its not likely to be updated any time soon, or release 64 version You might try compiling your own, or there might be a binary over at http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/	[reply]