Re: What's bugging you?

IMHO he's very explicit and especially this hint:

I'm tired of the people who enjoy a back-and-forth debate about how communities should run, and want to spread that joy to people not involved in the original discussion.

might indicate that it's not appropriate to discuss all of this here.

Cheers Rolf

PS: I was really tempted to use your name in this post's title ... wouldn't this be tiresome?

Comment on Re: What's bugging you?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: What's bugging you? by Anonymous Monk on Apr 24, 2011 at 09:22 UTC
might indicate that it's not appropriate to discuss all of this here. FWIW, I think it is about as appropriate for perlmonks as discussing politics Simply not a perlquestion	[reply]
Re^3: What's bugging you? by shawnhcorey (Friar) on Apr 24, 2011 at 18:14 UTC
Sorry but Points of Order are always in order. Having a discussion about how people should conduct themselves in your group is a Point of Order. If you don't allow them, then you don't have a group. At least, not for long.	[reply]
Re^4: What's bugging you? by Corion (Patriarch) on Apr 24, 2011 at 18:27 UTC
There is Meditations and Perl Monks Discussion, and not every "Point of Order" is to be discussed on this site, especially as its relation to this site and/or Perl are not really clear.	[reply]
Re^4: What's bugging you? by Anonymous Monk on Apr 24, 2011 at 18:53 UTC
Sorry, but beginners@perl.org is not perlmonks.org Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place. Cody Fendant wanted to know where to find the flame-war which inspired this That is not appropriate for Node Type: perlquestion. As written, I feel it is not appropriate for Perl Monks Discussion or Meditations either, though as Corion hinted, it could have been used as an inspiration for a monkdiscuss/perlmeditation posting, like "Should we adopt rules regarding ...?", "How to moderate ...", "Do you consider this rude, how do you deal?"	[reply]