Re^2: Perl script for serchin file content

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl script for serchin file content by marto (Cardinal) on Dec 20, 2011 at 11:10 UTC
Perhaps you're confused. This isn't a site where you can order people to create scripts for you and expect deliverables, nor is it a place to tell those trying to help you to "pleas shut you mouth". I suggest you read and understand PerlMonks for the Absolute Beginner and the rest of Understanding and Using PerlMonks. Doing so will help you understand what this site is for, and how to get the most out of it. You've already been told this isn't a code writing service.	[reply]
Re^4: Perl script for serchin file content by davido (Cardinal) on Dec 20, 2011 at 16:29 UTC
Those links will only help someone willing to learn and get along. For some individuals that's incompatible with their goals and/or capabilities. Dave	[reply]
Re^5: Perl script for serchin file content by marto (Cardinal) on Dec 20, 2011 at 16:32 UTC
You are of course correct, judging by the abusive responses from pavan129 in the chatterbox this morning I doubt they have any interest in reading anything anyone has to say, even if it's an effort to help them.	[reply]
Re^3: Perl script for serchin file content by i5513 (Pilgrim) on Dec 20, 2011 at 15:50 UTC
ok, I will not reply you again. Regards,	[reply]
Re: Reaped: Re^2: Perl script for serchin file content by ww (Archbishop) on Dec 20, 2011 at 18:20 UTC
We really should, IMO, restore the parent. Yes, it's immature but its value (OK, "very minimal value") lies in the manner it characterizes the OP... and it is utterly without "offensive" content, within the usual (artful) meaning of "offensive;" -- profanity, vulgarity and/or NSFW. AcidHawk: you really should read about the criteria for considerations. The flaws in the parent that you gave as reasons for reaping are NOT grounds for janitorial action.	[reply]
Re^2: Reaped: Re^2: Perl script for serchin file content by AcidHawk (Vicar) on Dec 21, 2011 at 09:36 UTC
Apologies - I actually did read the node regarding the criteria for considerations .. however I only did that after I had already hastily considered pavan129s' node. Possibly the frustration of the tone in the chatterbox and the lack of any attempt to try something/anything themself led to my incorrect actions. I would like to add though "Consideration is the process whereby the general population of the Monastery keeps the site clutter free, by cleaning up badly formatted/titled nodes and petitioning for reaping of undesirable posts." taken from What is consideration? I felt that pavan129's node had no value and only added clutter. However I take your point and will be more careful in future. ----- Of all the things I've lost in my life, its my mind I miss the most.	[reply]