in reply to (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval

Why should it matter? So long as it was approved and wasn't approved by two monks and didn't take down the whole server through a deadlock or something nasty of that sort it's fine isn't it?

True laziness is hard work
  • Comment on Re: (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval
by kcott (Archbishop) on Feb 07, 2012 at 22:46 UTC

    I reported an exception. I don't know if it matters. I don't know if it's fine.

    You seem annoyed. I don't know why that might be either.

    If it doesn't matter and everything is fine, please just tell me.

    -- Ken

      Sorry, I didn't intend to come across as annoyed. What you described in your initial node sounded like completely normal and expected behaviour in a slightly unusual, but not unexpected, situation.

      I don't understand what you mean by "I reported an exception". Maybe you mean there was some message or text that was out of the ordinary that you didn't report? If that was the case and you can browse back to the page it may be of interest to the site maintainers if you post the actual error or warning text. Note that there are many thousands of lines of code and many thousands of lines of HTML the make up PerlMonks so it is unlikely that a vague description of something that might be an error message will elicit and "ahh" response from the maintainers.

      True laziness is hard work

        OK. No worries.

        The reported message that was out of the ordinary was "Approved by ww" which appeared after I had completed the approval process. The expected message would obviously have been "Approved by kcott".

        -- Ken