Re^9: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

The bug is in the design, and I doubt that such an ugly templating system was ever intended, it has look and feel of an accident.

A real templating system in the core language and PHP wouldn't even exist today.

I would appreciate if future strictures would kill this possibility in favor of such real templating.

Cheers Rolf

Comment on Re^9: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 08, 2012 at 02:43 UTC
such an ugly templating system I see nothing in the OP that mentions "templating". I think you assume far, far to much. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^11: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references by LanX (Saint) on Mar 08, 2012 at 03:03 UTC
This whole mechanism is a backdoor to execute code while interpolating DB<106> print "@{ [`ls`] }" babel-14425MIs emacs1000 keyring-JbFqiG orbit-lanx perlfunc.pod ... [download] Thats a clear violation of the line between interpolation (like in `s//$x+1/`) and evaluation (like in `s//$x+1/e`) Cheers Rolf Updated example!	[reply] [d/l] [select]