Re^10: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

such an ugly templating system

I see nothing in the OP that mentions "templating". I think you assume far, far to much.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^10: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references by LanX (Saint) on Mar 08, 2012 at 03:03 UTC
This whole mechanism is a backdoor to execute code while interpolating DB<106> print "@{ [`ls`] }" babel-14425MIs emacs1000 keyring-JbFqiG orbit-lanx perlfunc.pod ... [download] Thats a clear violation of the line between interpolation (like in `s//$x+1/`) and evaluation (like in `s//$x+1/e`) Cheers Rolf Updated example!	[reply] [d/l] [select]