in reply to Re^7: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references
in thread Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

I'm not saying that it is elegant code -- though if we put our minds to it, we could probably think of a use. But if it is legal, and it is, then it ought to work consistently.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

  • Comment on Re^8: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references