in reply to Re^2: Common Perl Pitfalls
in thread Common Perl Pitfalls

Considering that Joe_'s example uses the handle INPUTFILE, I don't have any problems with the implication, and I really don't see the need to come up with the snobby term correct idiom. (You consider a piece of code with error handling to be correct idiom? You're fired).
I really like the second one, thanks. Not for production use, of course. :)
Why not? It's not significant different from your correct idiom. It misses error handling (but then, so does your correct idiom), but that's easily handled: just add a // die "slurp: $!";.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Common Perl Pitfalls
by dwalin (Monk) on Apr 10, 2012 at 23:50 UTC

    Considering that Joe_'s example uses a handle and your last two use filename, it could be confusing for a novice.

    Why I wouldn't use the second example in production? Readability. Not everybody is familiar with intimate relationship between @ARGV and <>, and this solution doesn't really give any advantage over the common one.

    P.S. As for your show-off harshness, I care less for anti-snobs than I do for snobs. You didn't hire me, you have no authority to fire me. Have a good day sir.

    Regards,
    Alex.

[reply]
      Not everybody
      Ah, but I don't have to write my production code for everybody. At best, only a hundred or so eyes will see my production code before it's obsolete or rewritten.
[reply]
        Well, I would consider myself lucky if I could afford writing production code knowing that only people smarter than me will ever see it. Not there yet, if ever.

        Regards,
        Alex.

[reply]

In Section Meditations