in reply to Re^21: Native newline encoding
in thread Native newline encoding

Wow. True colors and all that.

I'm simply explaining you the way it is designed to work.

No, you aren't. And I know how it works anyway, thanks much.

I'll remind you that sub-thread started with your assertion that "unicrap" was going to make the "RFCs" "messy".

Which is a bunch of hooey, of course, apparently originating with a deep misunderstanding of both the nature of unicode and the appropriate use of FTP.

It is obvious that peeling away these layers of misconception has made you uncomfortable... but I'm both surprised and disappointed by your transformation into a complete raving lunatic.

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^23: Native newline encoding
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 29, 2012 at 16:28 UTC

    Continue to live in cloud cuckoo land if you like.

    Until you bother yourself to read and understand the RFC, you'll continue to spout guff.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    The start of some sanity?
[reply]
      Until you bother yourself to read and understand the RFC

      You are making another incorrect assumption.

      -sauoq
      "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
[reply]

        There is no assumption, You made it very clear that you either haven't read or didn't understand RFC 959 when you make dumb statements like:

        "Your supposition that your transfer tools should be able to handle all necessary conversions for you is just wrong-headed."

        in response to a description of the standard FTP protocol since at least 1985, and continuing through all the revisions to date.

        You further make it clear by the way you cite no references; quote no authorities; just the world the way bones sees it.

        And that's ass-back'ds. A figment in the mind of a bones with a dogged nature. Too small-minded to admit your mistakes, so distract; digress; dissemble. Anything but stick to the subject.

        'nuff now. You bore me.

        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

        The start of some sanity?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom