in reply to Re^15: Native newline encoding
in thread Native newline encoding

What about that quote (which I said I've seen twice already) and that post (which I said I saw already)?

Suuuuure, an official spec says "go over here if you want the spec".

I'm using the "An intentionally false statement" definition.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^17: Native newline encoding
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 30, 2012 at 20:47 UTC

    What are you on?

    If you follow the link, and scroll to the top of the page it reads:

    Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition) W3C Recommendation 26 November 2008

    People wonder why I get frustrated by other supposedly intelligent people that cannot even follow a link and read what's there.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    The start of some sanity?
[reply]
      You're confusing what reply is about what despite proper quoting.
[reply]
        You're confusing what reply is about what despite proper quoting.

        Sorry, could you translate that into english please?

        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

        The start of some sanity?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom