in reply to Psychological 'warfare'?

I diagree -- there is not enough time in the day to go dissecting every nonsense code offered when solutions are already provided

so you're grumpy, that is no cause for laughably ridiculous suggestions

downvote the offending node and move on with your life

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Psychological 'warfare'?
by stevieb (Canon) on Jun 12, 2012 at 09:00 UTC

    lol... I upvoted all the good posts... I don't have no votes left! ;)

      Update: you can downvote everything I do, but I'll just remind you of if statement confusion.

      Well, obviously you were talking about a different situation than me. The situation I remembered was I post an answer, a complete solution, and someone shows up later with irrelevant junk that doesn't compile -- there no point in even discussing that junk, I'll point out that its junk , point out my solution, and I move on -- no point in discussing or dissecting all the things wrong with the junk

      Now back to Re^3: if statement confusion where you accuse blackstar of being a sockpuppet, just whose sockpuppet do you think blackstar is?

      His writing style isn't reminiscent of the other players in that thread , but his reappearance could be seen as suspicious

      I doubt the original account holder actually posted or was a sockpuppet -- I suppose the account could have been hacked ( It's Time for Everyone to Change Passwords! ) but I don't really know the odds of that happening, the gods would have a better idea