in reply to Re: Psychological 'warfare'?
in thread Psychological 'warfare'?

lol... I upvoted all the good posts... I don't have no votes left! ;)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Psychological 'warfare'?
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 12, 2012 at 09:11 UTC

    Update: you can downvote everything I do, but I'll just remind you of if statement confusion.

    Well, obviously you were talking about a different situation than me. The situation I remembered was I post an answer, a complete solution, and someone shows up later with irrelevant junk that doesn't compile -- there no point in even discussing that junk, I'll point out that its junk , point out my solution, and I move on -- no point in discussing or dissecting all the things wrong with the junk

    Now back to Re^3: if statement confusion where you accuse blackstar of being a sockpuppet, just whose sockpuppet do you think blackstar is?

    His writing style isn't reminiscent of the other players in that thread , but his reappearance could be seen as suspicious

    I doubt the original account holder actually posted or was a sockpuppet -- I suppose the account could have been hacked ( It's Time for Everyone to Change Passwords! ) but I don't really know the odds of that happening, the gods would have a better idea