Recently Active Threads

Viewing Nodes As of:	<<<<	<<<	<<	<	2003-11-01	>	>>	>>>	>>>>

+/-Legend (Top)

Title [^1](AC:3/9/7)+/- [author]

Means: You "^"=up- or "v"=down-voted, "1"=reputation; "AC" from ( Front-paged, Approved, Unapproved, Considered, or link to Parent or Root ); Replies: "3" direct, "9" descendents, "7" recent, "+/-" shows/hides(uses javascript)

View Full Documentation, Show Legend at Bottom

+/-PerlMonks Discussion (Top)

Readmore revisited... (FA:4/7/1)+/- 2003-10-30 15:34 23 years ago

[DentArthurDent]
- Re: Readmore revisited... (1)+/- 2003-10-30 16:21 23 years ago
  
  [barrd]
  - Re: Re: Readmore revisited... 2003-10-30 16:36 23 years ago
    
    [DentArthurDent]
- Re: Readmore revisited... 2003-10-30 16:35 23 years ago
  
  [phydeauxarff]
- Re: Readmore revisited... (1)+/- 2003-10-30 16:41 23 years ago
  
  [pg]
  - Re: Re: Readmore revisited... 2003-10-30 16:53 23 years ago
    
    [phydeauxarff]
- Re: Readmore revisited... (1)+/- 2003-10-30 20:30 23 years ago
  
  [ehdonhon]
  - Re: Re: Readmore revisited... 2003-10-31 21:56 23 years ago
    
    [Jenda]

+/-Questions (Top)

sorting a vec (A:3/12/1)+/- 2003-11-01 04:13 23 years ago

[mcinnes]
- Re: sorting a vec [3] 2003-11-01 04:40 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: sorting a vec (1/6)+/- 2003-11-01 05:38 23 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
  - Re: Re: sorting a vec [0](1/5)+/- 2003-11-02 16:08 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec (1/4)+/- 2003-11-02 16:49 23 years ago
      
      [BrowserUk]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec [0](1/3)+/- 2003-11-04 05:43 23 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec (1/2)+/- 2003-11-05 07:36 23 years ago
        
        [BrowserUk]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec [1](1)+/- 2004-03-28 02:10 22 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec 2004-03-28 04:37 22 years ago
        
        [BrowserUk]
- Re: sorting a vec (1/3)+/- 2003-11-01 20:53 23 years ago
  
  [graff]
  - Re: Re: sorting a vec [0](1/2)+/- 2003-11-02 15:53 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec (1)+/- 2003-11-02 16:25 23 years ago
      
      [graff]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: sorting a vec [0] 2003-11-04 05:55 23 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
javascript.. perl.. cookie (A:5/8)+/- 2003-10-31 22:53 23 years ago

[wolverina]
- Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie 2003-10-31 23:08 23 years ago
  
  [shenme]
- Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie (1/3)+/- 2003-10-31 23:45 23 years ago
  
  [antirice]
  - Re: Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie (1/2)+/- 2003-11-01 00:29 23 years ago
    
    [wolverina]
    - Re: Re: Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie (1)+/- 2003-11-01 01:15 23 years ago
      
      [antirice]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie 2003-11-01 01:26 23 years ago
        
        [wolverina]
- Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie 2003-11-01 00:59 23 years ago
  
  [injunjoel]
- Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie [-X] 2003-11-01 01:16 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: javascript.. perl.. cookie 2003-11-01 04:30 23 years ago
  
  [Cody Pendant]
Package Variables in Inheritance (A:5/9/7)+/- 2003-10-31 19:28 23 years ago

[reyjrar]
- Re: Package Variables in Inheritance 2003-10-31 19:40 23 years ago
  
  [broquaint]
- Re: Package Variables in Inheritance (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:52 23 years ago
  
  [perrin]
  - Re: Re: Package Variables in Inheritance 2003-10-31 20:15 23 years ago
    
    [reyjrar]
- Re: Package Variables in Inheritance 2003-10-31 20:25 23 years ago
  
  [tilly]
- Re: Package Variables in Inheritance (1/3/1)+/- 2003-10-31 20:50 23 years ago
  
  [hardburn]
  - Re: Re: Package Variables in Inheritance (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 21:11 23 years ago
    
    [reyjrar]
    - Re: Re: Re: Package Variables in Inheritance (1)+/- 2003-11-02 08:59 23 years ago
      
      [ysth]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Package Variables in Inheritance 2003-11-02 17:12 23 years ago
        
        [tilly]
- Re: Package Variables in Inheritance 2003-11-01 01:05 23 years ago
  
  [freddo411]
whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file (A:6/9/8)+/- 2003-10-31 19:26 23 years ago

[aussieaubs]
- Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:31 23 years ago
  
  [meetraz]
  - Re: Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file 2003-10-31 19:50 23 years ago
    
    [aussieaubs]
- Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:34 23 years ago
  
  [davido]
  - Re: Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file 2003-10-31 20:18 23 years ago
    
    [aussieaubs]
- Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file 2003-10-31 20:11 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
- Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file 2003-10-31 20:25 23 years ago
  
  [reclaw]
- Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file 2003-10-31 21:02 23 years ago
  
  [Art_XIV]
- Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file (1)+/- 2003-10-31 21:15 23 years ago
  
  [jZed]
  - Re: Re: whats the best way to query/extract fields from a tab delimited file 2003-11-03 16:21 23 years ago
    
    [aussieaubs]
Perl code timing (A:7/10/9)+/- 2003-10-31 18:32 23 years ago

[mcogan1966]
- Re: Perl code timing (2/3)+/- 2003-10-31 18:39 23 years ago
  
  [Ovid]
  - Re: Re: Perl code timing (1)+/- 2003-10-31 18:45 23 years ago
    
    [tbone]
    - Re(3): Perl code timing 2003-10-31 18:55 23 years ago
      
      [Ovid]
  - Re: Re: Perl code timing 2003-10-31 19:37 23 years ago
    
    [mcogan1966]
- Re: Perl code timing 2003-10-31 18:44 23 years ago
  
  [ChrisR]
- Re: Perl code timing 2003-10-31 18:46 23 years ago
  
  [etcshadow]
- Re: Perl code timing 2003-10-31 18:49 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
- Re: Perl code timing 2003-10-31 19:35 23 years ago
  
  [jeffa]
- Re: Perl code timing 2003-10-31 21:50 23 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
- Re: Perl code timing 2003-11-01 09:55 23 years ago
  
  [strat]
Streaming Chat (A:4/5/4)+/- 2003-10-31 18:20 23 years ago

[Kova]
- Re: Streaming Chat (1)+/- 2003-10-31 20:00 23 years ago
  
  [artist]
  - Re: Re: Streaming Chat 2003-10-31 22:38 23 years ago
    
    [Kova]
- Re: Streaming Chat 2003-10-31 21:08 23 years ago
  
  [etcshadow]
- Re: Streaming Chat 2003-10-31 21:43 23 years ago
  
  [{NULE}]
- Re: Streaming Chat 2003-11-01 09:52 23 years ago
  
  [strat]
pipes and return data [12](A:3/9/6)+/- 2003-10-31 18:15 23 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: pipes and return data 2003-10-31 18:29 23 years ago
  
  [mcogan1966]
- Re: pipes and return data (1/4/3)+/- 2003-10-31 18:32 23 years ago
  
  [Roy Johnson]
  - Re: Re: pipes and return data [2](3/2)+/- 2003-10-31 18:47 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: pipes and return data 2003-10-31 18:59 23 years ago
      
      [l2kashe]
    - Re: Re: Re: pipes and return data 2003-10-31 19:14 23 years ago
      
      [etcshadow]
    - Re: Re: Re: pipes and return data 2003-11-01 16:27 23 years ago
      
      [sgifford]
- Re: pipes and return data (2)+/- 2003-10-31 22:41 23 years ago
  
  [TomDLux]
  - Re: Re: pipes and return data [1] 2003-11-02 04:08 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re: Re: pipes and return data 2003-11-02 05:48 23 years ago
    
    [sauoq]
examples of IO::Socket::UNIX usage please? (A) 2003-10-31 18:06 23 years ago

[agh]
XML Validation from ActivePerl (A:1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 17:56 23 years ago

[relax99]
- Re: XML Validation from ActivePerl (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:09 23 years ago
  
  [samtregar]
  - Re: Re: XML Validation from ActivePerl [3] 2003-10-31 19:54 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
Unicode error (A:2)+/- 2003-10-31 17:51 23 years ago

[conan156]
- Re: Unicode error 2003-10-31 18:01 23 years ago
  
  [Thelonius]
- Re: Unicode error (\Q) 2003-10-31 19:09 23 years ago
  
  [tye]
Converting BNF for use in Parse::RecDescent [51](FA:3/2)+/- 2003-10-31 17:36 23 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Converting BNF for use in Parse::RecDescent 2003-10-31 17:47 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
- Re: Converting BNF for use in Parse::RecDescent 2003-10-31 18:26 23 years ago
  
  [daveyh]
- Re: Converting BNF for use in Parse::RecDescent 2003-11-01 17:23 23 years ago
  
  [hanenkamp]
How do I use CGI::Session constructor method with Class::DBI? (A:2)+/- 2003-10-31 17:36 23 years ago

[sbatty]
- Re: How do I use CGI::Session constructor method with Class::DBI? 2003-10-31 19:08 23 years ago
  
  [perrin]
- Re: How do I use CGI::Session constructor method with Class::DBI? 2003-10-31 19:15 23 years ago
  
  [jeffa]
How to use hashes well (A:3/4/3)+/- 2003-10-31 17:10 23 years ago

[cosmicsoup]
- Re: How to use hashes well (1)+/- 2003-10-31 17:19 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: Re: How to use hashes well 2003-11-01 10:45 23 years ago
    
    [Roger]
- Re: How to use hashes well 2003-10-31 17:54 23 years ago
  
  [agh]
- Re: How to use hashes well 2003-11-01 01:31 23 years ago
  
  [injunjoel]
A question about the diamond... (A:2/4)+/- 2003-10-31 17:07 23 years ago

[fokat]
- Re: A question about the diamond... (1)+/- 2003-10-31 17:12 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: Re: A question about the diamond... 2003-10-31 17:17 23 years ago
    
    [fokat]
- Re: A question about the diamond... (open) (1)+/- 2003-10-31 18:46 23 years ago
  
  [tye]
  - Re: Re: A question about the diamond... (open) 2003-10-31 18:57 23 years ago
    
    [fokat]
which book for mod_perl (A:4/3)+/- 2003-10-31 16:43 23 years ago

[Taulmarill]
- Re: which book for mod_perl 2003-10-31 17:22 23 years ago
  
  [jdtoronto]
- Re: which book for mod_perl 2003-10-31 17:22 23 years ago
  
  [sunadmn]
- Re: which book for mod_perl [1] 2003-11-01 02:49 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: which book for mod_perl 2003-11-02 16:18 23 years ago
  
  [adrianh]
A serch and replace question (FA:6/10/8)+/- 2003-10-31 16:15 23 years ago

[ChuckularOne]
- Re: A serch and replace question (2)+/- 2003-10-31 16:32 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: Re: A serch and replace question 2003-10-31 18:27 23 years ago
    
    [benizi]
  - Re: Re: A serch and replace question 2003-10-31 19:23 23 years ago
    
    [ChuckularOne]
- Re: A serch and replace question 2003-10-31 16:41 23 years ago
  
  [inman]
- Re: A serch and replace question (1)+/- 2003-10-31 16:46 23 years ago
  
  [PERLscienceman]
  - Re: Re: A serch and replace question [14] 2003-10-31 19:17 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: A search and replace question (1)+/- 2003-10-31 17:32 23 years ago
  
  [Roy Johnson]
  - Re: Re: A search and replace question 2003-10-31 21:25 23 years ago
    
    [duff]
- Re: A serch and replace question 2003-11-01 07:05 23 years ago
  
  [pizza_milkshake]
- Re: A serch and replace question 2003-11-01 11:30 23 years ago
  
  [bart]
More on Processing Command Line Arguments (A:6/12)+/- 2003-10-31 15:55 23 years ago

[Ninthwave]
- Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments (1)+/- 2003-10-31 16:01 23 years ago
  
  [ctilmes]
  - Re: Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments 2003-10-31 16:09 23 years ago
    
    [Ninthwave]
- Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 16:21 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments (1)+/- 2003-10-31 16:39 23 years ago
    
    [Ninthwave]
    - Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments 2003-10-31 16:42 23 years ago
      
      [Abigail-II]
- (shockme) Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments (1)+/- 2003-10-31 16:22 23 years ago
  
  [shockme]
  - Re: Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments 2003-10-31 16:44 23 years ago
    
    [Ninthwave]
- Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 16:50 23 years ago
  
  [Ovid]
  - Re: Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments (1)+/- 2003-10-31 17:01 23 years ago
    
    [Ninthwave]
    - Re: Re: Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments 2003-10-31 17:08 23 years ago
      
      [Ovid]
- Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments 2003-10-31 18:28 23 years ago
  
  [TomDLux]
- Re: More on Processing Command Line Arguments 2003-10-31 18:57 23 years ago
  
  [bbfu]
Net::POP3 (A:1/9)+/- 2003-10-31 15:15 23 years ago

[jarp]
- Re: Net::POP3 (1/8)+/- 2003-10-31 15:54 23 years ago
  
  [pinetree]
  - Re: Re: Net::POP3 (1/7)+/- 2003-10-31 15:58 23 years ago
    
    [jarp]
    - Re: Re: Re: Net::POP3 (2/6)+/- 2003-10-31 16:00 23 years ago
      
      [phydeauxarff]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Net::POP3 (1/4)+/- 2003-10-31 16:31 23 years ago
        
        [jarp]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Net::POP3 (1/3)+/- 2003-10-31 16:35 23 years ago
        
        [phydeauxarff]
        
        Net::POP3 (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 17:10 23 years ago
        
        [jarp]
        
        Re: Net::POP3 (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:00 23 years ago
        
        [pinetree]
        
        Re: Re: Net::POP3 2003-10-31 19:52 23 years ago
        
        [jarp]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Net::POP3 2003-10-31 16:40 23 years ago
        
        [jarp]
Better use of for() (A:3)+/- 2003-10-31 15:04 23 years ago

[DaWolf]
- Re: Better use of for() 2003-10-31 15:12 23 years ago
  
  [bart]
- Re: Better use of for() 2003-10-31 15:16 23 years ago
  
  [Limbic~Region]
- Re: Better use of for() 2003-10-31 17:52 23 years ago
  
  [hardburn]
5.8 hash as a reference is deprecated?? [58](FA:3/5)+/- 2003-10-31 12:58 23 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: 5.8 hash as a reference is deprecated?? (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 13:04 23 years ago
  
  [adrianh]
  - �Re: Re: 5.8 hash as a reference is deprecated?? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 13:16 23 years ago
    
    [merlyn]
    - Re^3: 5.8 hash as a reference is deprecated?? 2003-10-31 13:26 23 years ago
      
      [adrianh]
- Re: 5.8 hash as a reference is deprecated?? 2003-10-31 13:05 23 years ago
  
  [Limbic~Region]
- Re: 5.8 hash as a reference is deprecated?? 2003-10-31 16:28 23 years ago
  
  [pg]
sprintf format parameter required (FA:5/8)+/- 2003-10-31 05:26 23 years ago

[shenme]
- Re: sprintf format parameter required (1)+/- 2003-10-31 05:31 23 years ago
  
  [davido]
  - Re: Re: sprintf format parameter required 2003-10-31 05:36 23 years ago
    
    [shenme]
- Re: sprintf format parameter required 2003-10-31 06:14 23 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
- Re: sprintf format parameter required 2003-10-31 06:22 23 years ago
  
  [Roger]
- Re: sprintf format parameter required (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 09:33 23 years ago
  
  [demerphq]
  - Re: Re: sprintf format parameter required [17](1)+/- 2003-10-31 13:58 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: sprintf format parameter required 2003-10-31 16:09 23 years ago
      
      [demerphq]
- Re: sprintf format parameter required 2003-10-31 10:05 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) (FA:3/7/3)+/- 2003-10-31 03:22 23 years ago

[Roger]
- Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) (2/4/2)+/- 2003-10-31 03:30 23 years ago
  
  [diotalevi]
  - Re: Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) (1)+/- 2003-10-31 04:48 23 years ago
    
    [Roger]
    - Re: Re: Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) 2003-11-02 05:13 23 years ago
      
      [ysth]
  - Re: Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) (1)+/- 2003-10-31 05:44 23 years ago
    
    [pg]
    - Re: Re: Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) 2003-10-31 15:06 23 years ago
      
      [diotalevi]
- Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) 2003-10-31 04:37 23 years ago
  
  [pg]
- Re: Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }) 2003-10-31 09:57 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs (FA:10/18/13)+/- 2003-10-31 03:19 23 years ago

[bradcathey]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs [68] 2003-10-31 04:40 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs (1)+/- 2003-10-31 04:44 23 years ago
  
  [Plankton]
  - Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs [29] 2003-10-31 04:59 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs (1)+/- 2003-10-31 05:08 23 years ago
  
  [tilly]
  - Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 05:34 23 years ago
    
    [Roger]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 10:00 23 years ago
  
  [demerphq]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 13:35 23 years ago
  
  [Art_XIV]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 14:14 23 years ago
  
  [bradcathey]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 19:52 23 years ago
  
  [reclaw]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs (4/6)+/- 2003-10-31 20:25 23 years ago
  
  [heezy]
  - Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 20:38 23 years ago
    
    [tilly]
    - Re: Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs (1)+/- 2003-10-31 21:17 23 years ago
      
      [Art_XIV]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 22:09 23 years ago
        
        [tilly]
  - Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 21:15 23 years ago
    
    [Art_XIV]
  - Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 21:16 23 years ago
    
    [bradcathey]
  - Re: Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-10-31 22:29 23 years ago
    
    [runrig]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-11-02 19:16 23 years ago
  
  [graff]
- Re: Lots of subs in large program vs lots of small programs 2003-11-02 22:06 23 years ago
  
  [tunaboy]
How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? [7](A:5/8/4)+/- 2003-10-31 00:37 23 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? (1/2/1)+/- 2003-10-31 01:13 23 years ago
  
  [davido]
  - Re: Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? [7](1)+/- 2003-10-31 04:22 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? 2003-10-31 10:34 23 years ago
      
      [Abigail-II]
- Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? 2003-10-31 01:32 23 years ago
  
  [zentara]
- Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? 2003-10-31 04:06 23 years ago
  
  [graff]
- Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 11:19 23 years ago
  
  [ambrus]
  - Re: Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? 2003-10-31 14:34 23 years ago
    
    [dakkar]
- Re: How can I tell if a string contains binary data or plain-old text? 2003-10-31 14:43 23 years ago
  
  [dakkar]
running root command from cgi (A:3/5/1)+/- 2003-10-30 23:32 23 years ago

[XYZ]
- Re: running root command from cgi (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 00:21 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
  - Re: Re: running root command from cgi (1)+/- 2003-10-31 01:23 23 years ago
    
    [XYZ]
    - Re: Re: Re: running root command from cgi 2003-10-31 04:53 23 years ago
      
      [Plankton]
- Re: running root command from cgi 2003-10-31 01:32 23 years ago
  
  [jasonk]
- Re: running root command from cgi 2003-11-01 02:12 23 years ago
  
  [archen]
Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? (A:3/6/5)+/- 2003-10-30 23:23 23 years ago

[EXSPLRN]
- Re: Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 00:09 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
  - Re: Re: Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? 2003-10-31 14:28 23 years ago
    
    [EXSPLRN]
- Re: Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 11:05 23 years ago
  
  [Molt]
  - Re: Re: Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? 2003-10-31 14:30 23 years ago
    
    [EXSPLRN]
- Re: Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 11:35 23 years ago
  
  [castaway]
  - Re: Re: Ran my script, got a 500, and now the code is encoded??? 2003-10-31 14:31 23 years ago
    
    [EXSPLRN]
Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (FA:5/21/4)+/- 2003-10-30 18:46 23 years ago

[prostoalex]
- Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (2/7)+/- 2003-10-30 18:56 23 years ago
  
  [hardburn]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (2/4)+/- 2003-10-30 19:09 23 years ago
    
    [sauoq]
    - Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-30 19:45 23 years ago
      
      [tlhf]
    - Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (2)+/- 2003-10-30 20:37 23 years ago
      
      [pg]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-30 21:00 23 years ago
        
        [sauoq]
      - Re:x4 Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-30 21:32 23 years ago
        
        [Roy Johnson]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (1)+/- 2003-10-30 19:37 23 years ago
    
    [asarih]
    - Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-30 19:56 23 years ago
      
      [tlhf]
- Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (1)+/- 2003-10-30 19:01 23 years ago
  
  [runrig]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-30 19:30 23 years ago
    
    [CountZero]
- Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (2/6/1)+/- 2003-10-30 19:53 23 years ago
  
  [sgifford]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (1/2)+/- 2003-10-30 20:21 23 years ago
    
    [Nkuvu]
    - Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (1)+/- 2003-10-30 20:43 23 years ago
      
      [sgifford]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-30 22:01 23 years ago
        
        [Nkuvu]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphbetical order match within the string (1/2/1)+/- 2003-10-30 21:09 23 years ago
    
    [Roy Johnson]
    - Re: Re: Re: Regexp for alphbetical order match within the string (1)+/- 2003-10-30 22:33 23 years ago
      
      [BrowserUk]
      - Re: Regexp for alphbetical order match within the string 2003-10-31 14:47 23 years ago
        
        [Roy Johnson]
- Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (1)+/- 2003-10-30 20:07 23 years ago
  
  [duff]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-31 05:46 23 years ago
    
    [aquarium]
- Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string (1)+/- 2003-10-31 10:21 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: Re: Regexp for alphabetical order match within the string 2003-10-31 21:24 23 years ago
    
    [jweed]
Perl::Expect - DataTrack Escape Sequence (FA:1/4/1)+/- 2003-10-30 17:27 23 years ago

[set_uk]
- Re: Perl::Expect - DataTrack Escape Sequence (1/3/1)+/- 2003-10-30 20:10 23 years ago
  
  [sgifford]
  - Re: Re: Perl::Expect - DataTrack Escape Sequence (1/2/1)+/- 2003-10-31 00:14 23 years ago
    
    [set_uk]
    - Re: Re: Re: Perl::Expect - DataTrack Escape Sequence (1)+/- 2003-10-31 02:20 23 years ago
      
      [sgifford]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl::Expect - DataTrack Escape Sequence 2003-10-31 13:09 23 years ago
        
        [set_uk]
File upload w/WWW::Mechanize (A:2/6/1)+/- 2003-10-30 13:54 23 years ago

[jkenneth]
- Re: File upload w/WWW::Mechanize 2003-10-30 16:57 23 years ago
  
  [Corion]
- Re: File upload w/WWW::Mechanize (1/4)+/- 2003-10-31 17:49 23 years ago
  
  [jkenneth]
  - Re^2: File upload w/WWW::Mechanize (1/3)+/- 2016-03-11 14:16 10 years ago
    
    [jczeus]
    - Re^3: File upload w/WWW::Mechanize [5](1/2)+/- 2016-03-12 00:11 10 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re^4: File upload w/WWW::Mechanize (1)+/- 2019-12-30 17:16 6 years ago
        
        [c-alpha]
        
        Re^5: File upload w/WWW::Mechanize [2] 2019-12-30 19:23 6 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
Running on DOS without the DOS box? (A:2/5/1)+/- 2003-10-30 13:16 23 years ago

[DaWolf]
- Re: Running on DOS without the DOS box? -> wperl (2)+/- 2003-10-30 13:24 23 years ago
  
  [bart]
  - Re: Re: Running on DOS without the DOS box? 2003-10-30 13:37 23 years ago
    
    [DaWolf]
  - Re: Re: Running on DOS without the DOS box? 2003-10-30 14:37 23 years ago
    
    [sweetblood]
- Re: Running on DOS without the DOS box? (1)+/- 2003-10-30 20:34 23 years ago
  
  [meetraz]
  - Re: Re: Running on DOS without the DOS box? [4] 2003-10-31 07:45 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
MLDBM slows down my script (A:2/5/2)+/- 2003-10-30 09:31 23 years ago

[js1]
- Re: MLDBM slows down my script (1)+/- 2003-10-30 12:01 23 years ago
  
  [edan]
  - Re: Re: MLDBM slows down my script 2003-10-30 16:29 23 years ago
    
    [js1]
- Re: MLDBM slows down my script (1/2)+/- 2003-10-30 16:43 23 years ago
  
  [perrin]
  - Re: Re: MLDBM slows down my script (1)+/- 2003-10-31 12:20 23 years ago
    
    [js1]
    - Re: Re: Re: MLDBM slows down my script 2003-10-31 15:24 23 years ago
      
      [perrin]
regex regexen (FA:3/5/1)+/- 2003-10-30 04:45 23 years ago

[mooresan]
- Re: regex regexen 2003-10-30 06:01 23 years ago
  
  [jryan]
- Re: regex regexen (1)+/- 2003-10-30 09:32 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: regex regexen 2003-10-31 10:57 23 years ago
    
    [Abigail-II]
- Re: regex regexen (1)+/- 2003-10-30 12:13 23 years ago
  
  [tbone1]
  - Re: Re: regex regexen 2003-10-31 00:15 23 years ago
    
    [mooresan]
true environment (FA:5/6/2)+/- 2003-10-30 02:48 23 years ago

[tallfred]
- Re: true environment (1)+/- 2003-10-30 03:13 23 years ago
  
  [Zaxo]
  - Re: true environment 2003-10-30 09:41 23 years ago
    
    [Abigail-II]
- Re: true environment 2003-10-30 03:33 23 years ago
  
  [PodMaster]
- Re: true environment 2003-10-30 13:09 23 years ago
  
  [ptkdb]
- Re: true environment 2003-10-31 19:55 23 years ago
  
  [what]
- Re: true environment 2003-10-31 20:07 23 years ago
  
  [benizi]
Windows pitfall: Subroutine redefined with use Modul (A:3/4/1)+/- 2003-10-29 09:54 23 years ago

[Brutha]
- Re: Windows pitfall: Subroutine redefined with use Modul 2003-10-29 11:04 23 years ago
  
  [Aragorn]
- Re: Windows pitfall: Subroutine redefined with use Modul (1)+/- 2003-10-29 11:14 23 years ago
  
  [bart]
  - Re: Re: Windows pitfall: Subroutine redefined with use Modul 2003-10-31 10:39 23 years ago
    
    [Brutha]
- Re: Windows pitfall: Subroutine redefined with use Modul 2003-10-29 11:30 23 years ago
  
  [dada]
need help to split list (FA:8/14/1)+/- 2003-10-24 21:34 23 years ago

[bfdi533]
- Re: need help to split list (2)+/- 2003-10-24 21:54 23 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
  - Re: Re: need help to split list 2003-10-24 22:21 23 years ago
    
    [sgifford]
  - Re: Re: need help to split list [20] 2003-10-25 10:49 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: need help to split list 2003-10-24 21:58 23 years ago
  
  [Cody Pendant]
- Re: need help to split list 2003-10-24 22:00 23 years ago
  
  [chromatic]
- Re: need help to split list (1)+/- 2003-10-24 22:02 23 years ago
  
  [gjb]
  - Re: Re: need help to split list 2003-10-26 22:47 23 years ago
    
    [bfdi533]
- Re: need help to split list (1)+/- 2003-10-25 00:13 23 years ago
  
  [daddyefsacks]
  - Re: Re: need help to split list 2003-10-31 19:22 23 years ago
    
    [bfdi533]
- Re: need help to split list 2003-10-25 05:48 23 years ago
  
  [tilly]
- Re: need help to split list (1/2)+/- 2003-10-25 12:04 23 years ago
  
  [Roger]
  - Re: Re: need help to split list (1)+/- 2003-10-26 07:40 23 years ago
    
    [OverlordQ]
    - Re: Re: Re: need help to split list 2003-10-26 11:06 23 years ago
      
      [Roger]
- Re: need help to split list 2003-10-26 22:19 23 years ago
  
  [qq]

+/-Meditations (Top)

Naming a Mail Action Module (A:5/7/3)+/- 2003-10-31 20:24 23 years ago

[chromatic]
- Re: Naming a Mail Action Module 2003-10-31 20:57 23 years ago
  
  [Ovid]
- Re: Naming a Mail Action Module (2)+/- 2003-11-01 01:59 23 years ago
  
  [demerphq]
  - Re^2: Naming a Mail Action Module 2003-11-01 07:23 23 years ago
    
    [Aristotle]
  - Re: Re: Naming a Mail Action Module 2003-11-01 19:17 23 years ago
    
    [sauoq]
- Re: Naming a Mail Action Module 2003-11-01 04:31 23 years ago
  
  [simonm]
- Re: Naming a Mail Action Module 2003-11-01 19:09 23 years ago
  
  [jZed]
- Re: Naming a Mail Action Module 2003-11-01 19:54 23 years ago
  
  [Aristotle]
RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple (A:3/6/4)+/- 2003-10-31 18:22 23 years ago

[Ovid]
- Re: RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple (1)+/- 2003-10-31 21:37 23 years ago
  
  [gjb]
  - Re: Re: RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple 2003-10-31 22:18 23 years ago
    
    [Ovid]
- Re: RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple (1)+/- 2003-10-31 21:59 23 years ago
  
  [hardburn]
  - Re: Re: RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple 2003-10-31 22:22 23 years ago
    
    [Ovid]
- Re: RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple (1)+/- 2003-11-02 05:57 23 years ago
  
  [SpritusMaximus]
  - Re: Re: RFC: AI::NeuralNet::Simple 2003-11-02 06:11 23 years ago
    
    [Mr. Muskrat]
Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (FA:22/32/17)+/- 2003-10-31 15:20 23 years ago

[talexb]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1/2/1)+/- 2003-10-31 15:36 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
  - Re: Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 16:26 23 years ago
    
    [talexb]
    - Re^3: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2023-07-30 11:49 3 years ago
      
      [eyepopslikeamosquito]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 15:54 23 years ago
  
  [gjb]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 16:25 23 years ago
  
  [barrd]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 16:29 23 years ago
  
  [perrin]
  - Re: Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 17:02 23 years ago
    
    [talexb]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 16:37 23 years ago
  
  [jZed]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 17:42 23 years ago
  
  [theorbtwo]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 17:46 23 years ago
  
  [castaway]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 18:41 23 years ago
  
  [Marza]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-10-31 19:29 23 years ago
  
  [etcshadow]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:34 23 years ago
  
  [samtregar]
  - Re: Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? [17] 2003-11-01 01:58 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1/3/1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:53 23 years ago
  
  [mcogan1966]
  - Re: Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 20:12 23 years ago
    
    [QM]
    - Re: Re: Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1)+/- 2003-11-02 19:11 23 years ago
      
      [mcogan1966]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-03 05:30 23 years ago
        
        [QM]
- �Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? (1)+/- 2003-10-31 23:54 23 years ago
  
  [merlyn]
  - Re: •Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-03 20:55 23 years ago
    
    [jdtoronto]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-01 01:38 23 years ago
  
  [The Mad Hatter]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-01 06:51 23 years ago
  
  [theorbtwo]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-01 14:38 23 years ago
  
  [bradcathey]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-02 00:55 23 years ago
  
  [WhiteBird]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-02 12:50 23 years ago
  
  [DaWolf]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-03 09:50 23 years ago
  
  [Ryszard]
- Generic HTML Form Validator (1/2)+/- 2003-11-03 14:49 23 years ago
  
  [YAFZ]
  - Re: Generic HTML Form Validator (1)+/- 2003-11-03 22:37 23 years ago
    
    [jZed]
    - Re: Re: Generic HTML Form Validator 2003-11-04 08:06 23 years ago
      
      [YAFZ]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-03 16:33 23 years ago
  
  [Helter]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-04 07:35 23 years ago
  
  [allolex]
- Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone? 2003-11-04 12:18 23 years ago
  
  [tsee]
(OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (A:5/24/20)+/- 2003-10-31 09:56 23 years ago

[BUU]
- Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. (2/6)+/- 2003-10-31 11:41 23 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
  - Re: Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. (3/4)+/- 2003-10-31 14:43 23 years ago
    
    [hardburn]
    - Re: Re: Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-10-31 16:55 23 years ago
      
      [diotalevi]
    - Re: Re: Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-10-31 17:20 23 years ago
      
      [jsprat]
    - Re: Re: Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. (1)+/- 2003-10-31 21:00 23 years ago
      
      [BrowserUk]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-10-31 21:06 23 years ago
        
        [hardburn]
  - Re: Re: OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-11-01 04:13 23 years ago
    
    [simonm]
- Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (4/6/2)+/- 2003-10-31 11:53 23 years ago
  
  [castaway]
  - Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-10-31 14:55 23 years ago
    
    [rir]
  - Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (1)+/- 2003-10-31 19:13 23 years ago
    
    [BUU]
    - Re: Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-11-01 11:21 23 years ago
      
      [castaway]
  - Re+:(OT) OOUI:[...] (YALABBUkP) (1)+/- 2003-11-01 06:08 23 years ago
    
    [BrowserUk]
    - Re: Re+:(OT) OOUI:[...] (YALABBUkP) 2003-11-01 11:09 23 years ago
      
      [castaway]
  - Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-11-01 18:52 23 years ago
    
    [sauoq]
- Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-10-31 13:46 23 years ago
  
  [perrin]
- Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (1/7)+/- 2003-10-31 16:29 23 years ago
  
  [hardburn]
  - Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. [2](1/6)+/- 2003-10-31 17:17 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (1/5)+/- 2003-10-31 17:34 23 years ago
      
      [hardburn]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. [0](1/4)+/- 2003-10-31 17:55 23 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (1/3)+/- 2003-10-31 18:43 23 years ago
        
        [hardburn]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. [0](1/2)+/- 2003-10-31 21:08 23 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
        
        Re^7: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. (1)+/- 2003-10-31 21:43 23 years ago
        
        [hardburn]
        
        Re^8: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. [0] 2003-10-31 23:02 23 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: (OT) OOUI: multiple views in an object. 2003-10-31 18:39 23 years ago
  
  [dpuu]
Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [79](FA:10/34/3)+/- 2003-10-28 02:02 23 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (2/3/1)+/- 2003-10-28 02:20 23 years ago
  
  [tachyon]
  - Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [7] 2003-10-28 03:07 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [1](1)+/- 2003-10-30 17:22 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [0] 2003-11-01 00:34 23 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1/2)+/- 2003-10-28 02:35 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
  - Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1)+/- 2003-10-28 03:02 23 years ago
    
    [tachyon]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 17:57 23 years ago
      
      [sauoq]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1/12/1)+/- 2003-10-28 02:56 23 years ago
  
  [TVSET]
  - Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (3/11/1)+/- 2003-10-28 08:28 23 years ago
    
    [castaway]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1/3)+/- 2003-10-28 10:03 23 years ago
      
      [davis]
      - Re:^4 Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (2)+/- 2003-10-28 12:20 23 years ago
        
        [BazB]
        
        Re:^5 Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 12:53 23 years ago
        
        [davis]
        
        Re: Re:^4 Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-29 09:23 23 years ago
        
        [castaway]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (3/5)+/- 2003-10-28 11:29 23 years ago
      
      [tachyon]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1)+/- 2003-10-28 17:51 23 years ago
        
        [revdiablo]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-29 00:27 23 years ago
        
        [tachyon]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1)+/- 2003-10-28 18:05 23 years ago
        
        [Roy Johnson]
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [1] 2003-10-31 01:26 23 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 18:45 23 years ago
        
        [Zero_Flop]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [1] 2003-10-31 16:25 23 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1/2)+/- 2003-10-28 02:56 23 years ago
  
  [pg]
  - Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [17](1)+/- 2003-10-28 03:13 23 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 14:04 23 years ago
      
      [Hena]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 11:44 23 years ago
  
  [Jaap]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 12:24 23 years ago
  
  [IlyaM]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 14:10 23 years ago
  
  [bassplayer]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-28 16:08 23 years ago
  
  [zentara]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [5](1/5/1)+/- 2003-10-29 02:33 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (2/3/1)+/- 2003-10-29 02:48 23 years ago
    
    [sauoq]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers (1)+/- 2003-10-30 15:21 23 years ago
      
      [halley]
      - Re: Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers 2003-10-30 16:57 23 years ago
        
        [sauoq]
    - Re: Re: Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [0] 2003-11-01 02:52 23 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Enough is Enough - Taking the fight back to the Internet scammers [0] 2003-12-06 19:42 22 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
Is CPAN fish or fishing? (FA:12/15/1)+/- 2003-10-27 23:45 23 years ago

[BrowserUk]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-27 23:55 23 years ago
  
  [sauoq]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-28 00:22 23 years ago
  
  [QM]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? (1/2/1)+/- 2003-10-28 00:24 23 years ago
  
  [kvale]
  - Re: Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? (1)+/- 2003-10-28 00:58 23 years ago
    
    [chromatic]
    - Re: Re: Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-31 15:04 23 years ago
      
      [Ninthwave]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-28 00:42 23 years ago
  
  [Abigail-II]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? [19] 2003-10-28 00:48 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-28 01:08 23 years ago
  
  [Zaxo]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-28 02:35 23 years ago
  
  [pg]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-28 06:50 23 years ago
  
  [Juerd]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-28 07:04 23 years ago
  
  [davido]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-10-29 14:23 23 years ago
  
  [ptkdb]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? (It's the ocean!) 2003-10-29 22:00 23 years ago
  
  [BrowserUk]
- Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? (1)+/- 2003-11-04 05:56 23 years ago
  
  [vacant]
  - Re: Re: Is CPAN fish or fishing? 2003-11-04 08:23 23 years ago
    
    [BrowserUk]

+/-Perl Poems (Top)

my($hort_description); (A:2/4/3)+/- 2003-10-29 21:13 23 years ago

[giulia]
- Re: my($hort_description); (1)+/- 2003-10-29 23:21 23 years ago
  
  [SleepNot]
  - Re: Re: my($hort_description); 2003-10-31 15:06 23 years ago
    
    [giulia]
- Re: my($hort_description); [1](1)+/- 2003-10-31 15:29 23 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re: Re: my($hort_description); 2003-10-31 22:13 23 years ago
    
    [SleepNot]

+/-Obfuscation (Top)

One-liner japh (A) 2003-10-31 08:12 23 years ago

[ambrus]

+/-Users (Top)

what 2003-10-31 19:43 23 years ago
Kova 2003-10-31 17:57 23 years ago
daveyh 2003-10-31 17:15 23 years ago
conan156 2003-10-31 17:01 23 years ago
TheFluffyOne 2003-10-31 14:48 23 years ago