Re^2: Plea for upvotes.

That is what I am thinking. Buk is being somewhat unprofessional with his posts, see Re: When travelling, what level of existential comfort do you require? (just 1 word, "Progress") and Re^3: Plea for upvotes. (empty node ATM).

Is Buk an imposter/troll while BrowserUk is on vacation (but he is british right? no labor day)? The anti-Tye is legit
Was BrowserUk hacked and posted the hacker posted the anti-Tye node, then Buk the imposter (a 2nd party or the 1st party) popped up to keep the troll ball rolling, just like BrovvserUk has in the past?
Is Buk BrovvserUk?
Did BrowserUk post the anti-Tye node legit, then because of community outrage someone created the Buk to troll and make BrowserUk look negative and BrowserUk is remaining quiet until gods intervention?
Are the technical problems in Re^4: Who gave (and continues to give) Tye his authority for his autocratic domination of PerlMonks? real or a cover story by Buk for BrowserUk and Buk to be logged in at the same time?
Is Plea for upvotes. a strategy for a troll to get 900 XP and consideration power?
Tye denies banning BrowserUk in Re^2: Plea for upvotes. (nonsense), but he isn't speaking for any other gods
Did a god other than Tye ban BrowserUk for disrespect/trolling?
Did a god other than Tye ban/lock BrowserUk for being hacked?
Did BrowserUk write the anti-Tye node legit, then his ISP happened to get kiddy filters and perlmonks is blacklisted as an extremist religious order?

Comment on Re^2: Plea for upvotes.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Plea for upvotes. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 03, 2013 at 05:36 UTC
Is Buk an imposter/troll while BrowserUk is on vacation No. They were both me. For the rest of your questions; I have no answers beyond: I guess I said too much. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^4: Plea for upvotes. by CountZero (Bishop) on Sep 03, 2013 at 05:59 UTC
I guess I said too much. You said a lot, but it was small in content. At least I don't understand the problem. You have posted the above message from your BrowserUK account, so what is exactly the problem? CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James My blog: Imperial Deltronics	[reply]
Re^5: Plea for upvotes. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 03, 2013 at 06:02 UTC
so what is exactly the problem? That should be "so what was exactly the problem?". With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^6: Plea for upvotes. by CountZero (Bishop) on Sep 03, 2013 at 06:10 UTC
Re^6: Plea for upvotes. by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Sep 03, 2013 at 09:13 UTC
Re^7: Plea for upvotes. by hdb (Monsignor) on Sep 03, 2013 at 09:41 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^7: Plea for upvotes. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 03, 2013 at 09:34 UTC