"The four of you" "reflexively "downvote."

SunnyD, you don't often surprise me. Today you just have. After claiming for years that precisely seven monks downvote you, today you've reduced that number to four. Why?

For the record, here are your previous claims of exactly seven down-voters:

• And here's why I think "downvotes" should be eliminated, or tabulated separately ... (downvotes: 61)
• Just curious: is there a BOT that downvotes "me?" (downvotes: 49)
• Re^3: Imagination greater than reality? (downvotes: 28)
• Re: Feature: Auto hide. Change: show node vote counts to all, not just logged in users. (downvotes: 17)
• Re^3: Perl Security Testing (downvotes: 28)
• Re^4: mod_perl best practice to consume dynamic file (downvotes: 23)
• Re^5: Check multiple lines exist in a record (downvotes: 22)
• Re^2: Other effects of 'use utf8' on script (downvotes: 27)
• Re^2: Why did you become a Perl expert (or programmer)? (downvotes: 22)
• Re^2: XML access the REPEATING NODE VALUES (downvotes: 19)

As you can see, every one of these nodes went on to garner considerably more than the target of seven downvotes ... perhaps making you an over-achiever.