in reply to Re^5: Reporting a bug in Perl is tricky
in thread Reporting a bug in Perl is tricky

You know that, and therefore for you it is mere noise. Does the "average" person reporting perl bugs know it?

I admit that finding bugs in perl that don't turn out to be bugs in one's own code, calls for a certain amount of expertise, and so anyone using perlbug might know this anyway, and perhaps the OP was an exception, but …
  • Comment on Re^6: Reporting a bug in Perl is tricky

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Reporting a bug in Perl is tricky
by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 20, 2016 at 18:00 UTC
    If they don't know email is unreliable, I don't see how the alternative phrasing you proposed is going to help any.
      From my experience in user support: they might not even be aware that email is involved. Could be sent by fax or telepathy :-)

      Joking aside, if I'm deeply concentrating on some complicated matter, I tend to totally blend out everything else. This (although overly legalese) wording would remind me the system has other parts that matter, too.

        If "[Se]nd the message to perlbug@perl.org" doesn't suggest an email, I don't know what does. But if the problem is that you think it's not clear that email is being used, the fix would be to change that prompt to "[Se]nd the message by email to perlbug@perl.org"