Re^3: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6

While I agree with you, I'm reluctant to repeat a discussion we just had not long ago.

Please don't fall into the trap to feed a certain monk, who tries to push his agenda again and again by attacking Perl6 posts.

update

Or in divine words

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

Comment on Re^3: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 by Discipulus (Canon) on Nov 23, 2016 at 22:20 UTC
The underlying question is if it is a good think to encourage people who can edit node titles to put the `[Perl6]` tag on other's posts. I agree. L* There are no rules, there are no thumbs.. Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 by 1nickt (Canon) on Nov 24, 2016 at 10:53 UTC
Well, since you brought it up. You may try to make it seem like one person's grudge, but the vote counts inconveniently show a consistent 25% to 50% minority of voters agrees with me. not-Perl6 is not Perl and should have its own name, its own CPAN, and its own community learning website. It should stand on its own two feet (after 16 years!) or fall on its face, but quit riding on Perl's reputation, undermining it, and spreading confusion. The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply]
Re^5: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2016 at 20:54 UTC
You may try to make it seem like one person's grudge, but the vote counts inconveniently show a consistent 25% to 50% minority of voters agrees with me. not Its common folly to read too much into votes, or percentages ... lots of people downvote for bad formmating, lots of people downvote actual working code answers for whatever reason ... votes, they're very moody There is a right way and a wrong way to chime-in on somebody's question, your way is the wrong way it comes off as "hate" , but its not too much of a deal if the volume of such posts is very low	[reply]