Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6

Well, since you brought it up.

You may try to make it seem like one person's grudge, but the vote counts inconveniently show a consistent 25% to 50% minority of voters agrees with me. not-Perl6 is not Perl and should have its own name, its own CPAN, and its own community learning website. It should stand on its own two feet (after 16 years!) or fall on its face, but quit riding on Perl's reputation, undermining it, and spreading confusion.

The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Comment on Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2016 at 20:54 UTC
You may try to make it seem like one person's grudge, but the vote counts inconveniently show a consistent 25% to 50% minority of voters agrees with me. not Its common folly to read too much into votes, or percentages ... lots of people downvote for bad formmating, lots of people downvote actual working code answers for whatever reason ... votes, they're very moody There is a right way and a wrong way to chime-in on somebody's question, your way is the wrong way it comes off as "hate" , but its not too much of a deal if the volume of such posts is very low	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2016 at 20:54 UTC

You may try to make it seem like one person's grudge, but the vote counts inconveniently show a consistent 25% to 50% minority of voters agrees with me. not

Its common folly to read too much into votes, or percentages ... lots of people downvote for bad formmating, lots of people downvote actual working code answers for whatever reason ... votes, they're very moody

There is a right way and a wrong way to chime-in on somebody's question, your way is the wrong way it comes off as "hate" , but its not too much of a deal if the volume of such posts is very low

[reply]