Recently Active Threads

█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █

Viewing Nodes As of: <<<< <<< << < 2009-03-16 > >> >>> >>>>
Current View Mode is Node Ancestors, switch to Root and Node, Minimal Nodes or Full Thread
Jump to Help | Legend | Page Settings | PerlMonks Discussion | Questions | Meditations | Cool Uses For Perl | Polls | Users

+/-PerlMonks Discussion (Top)

So it's homework - so what? (A:13/35/1)+/- 2001-10-25 21:40 24 years ago

[tachyon]
- Re: So it's homework - so what? (1/9/1)+/- 2001-10-26 16:35 24 years ago
  
  [buckaduck]
  - Re: Re: So it's homework - so what? (1/8/1)+/- 2001-10-27 19:17 24 years ago
    
    [Fletch]
    - Re: So it's homework - so what? (1/7/1)+/- 2001-11-01 22:30 24 years ago
      
      [Dominus]
      - Re^2: So it's homework - so what? (1/6) 2009-03-15 20:59 17 years ago
        
        [Lawliet]

+/-Questions (Top)

inscrutable error in CPAN testing (A) 2009-03-16 03:54 17 years ago

[cmac]
Time::Piece wrong timezone? [9](A:2/4/3)+/- 2009-03-16 00:54 17 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Time::Piece wrong timezone? [0](1) 2009-03-16 02:25 17 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Time::Piece wrong timezone? (1)+/- 2009-03-16 02:47 17 years ago
  
  [ig]
  - Re^2: Time::Piece wrong timezone? [1] 2009-03-16 03:32 17 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
how to hack on pugs in ghci? how to use perl6 regexen and grammars in haskell? (A:2/5/4)+/- 2009-03-15 18:48 17 years ago

[tphyahoo]
- Re: how to hack on pugs in ghci? (1/2/1)+/- 2009-03-15 19:12 17 years ago
  
  [tphyahoo]
  - Re^2: how to hack on pugs in ghci? (1) 2009-03-15 19:21 17 years ago
    
    [tphyahoo]
- Re: how to hack on pugs in ghci? how to use perl6 regexen and grammars in haskell? (1)+/- 2009-03-15 20:36 17 years ago
  
  [grinder]
  - Re^2: how to hack on pugs in ghci? how to use perl6 regexen and grammars in haskell? 2009-03-16 03:00 17 years ago
    
    [tphyahoo]
cant locate @INC (A:2)+/- 2009-03-15 17:46 17 years ago

[uskidsknow]
- Re: cant locate @INC 2009-03-15 17:54 17 years ago
  
  [CountZero]
- Re: cant locate @INC [8] 2009-03-15 23:25 17 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
pod-coverage.t can't find the POD (A:3/4/2)+/- 2009-03-15 16:57 17 years ago

[hesco]
- Re: pod-coverage.t can't find the POD 2009-03-15 19:29 17 years ago
  
  [ikegami]
- Re: pod-coverage.t can't find the POD [10] 2009-03-15 23:23 17 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
store threaded discussion [5](A:1)+/- 2009-03-15 16:46 17 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: store threaded discussion 2009-03-15 21:05 17 years ago
  
  [Tanktalus]
monitoring memory load (A:1/2/1)+/- 2009-03-15 14:38 17 years ago

[sashac88]
- Re: monitoring memory load (1) 2009-03-15 15:18 17 years ago
  
  [zentara]
Using the perl debugger (A:5/16/12)+/- 2009-03-15 09:29 17 years ago

[incognito129]
- Re: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 11:13 17 years ago
  
  [codeacrobat]
- Re: Using the perl debugger (4/5)+/- 2009-03-15 11:24 17 years ago
  
  [ww]
  - Re^2: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 12:07 17 years ago
    
    [codeacrobat]
  - Re^2: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 12:21 17 years ago
    
    [almut]
  - Re^2: Using the perl debugger (1)+/- 2009-03-15 12:49 17 years ago
    
    [ww]
    - Re^3: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 13:02 17 years ago
      
      [almut]
  - Re^2: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 19:37 17 years ago
    
    [incognito129]
- Re: Using the perl debugger (1/2)+/- 2009-03-15 17:23 17 years ago
  
  [planetscape]
  - Re^2: Using the perl debugger (1)+/- 2009-03-15 17:47 17 years ago
    
    [almut]
    - Re^3: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 18:34 17 years ago
      
      [planetscape]
- Re: Using the perl debugger 2009-03-15 21:06 17 years ago
  
  [graff]
- Re: Using the perl debugger (3/4) 2009-03-15 22:45 17 years ago
  
  [educated_foo]
Perl 6 strings, interpolation and templates? (A:2/6/1)+/- 2009-03-15 00:00 17 years ago

[BerntB]
- Re: Perl 6 strings, interpolation and templates? (1) 2009-03-15 18:14 17 years ago
  
  [moritz]
splitting files (A:4/2)+/- 2009-03-14 21:35 17 years ago

[baxy77bax]
- Re: splitting files 2009-03-15 06:38 17 years ago
  
  [ELISHEVA]
- Re: splitting files 2009-03-15 22:40 17 years ago
  
  [graff]
array reference madness [17](A:1/6/1)+/- 2009-03-14 21:04 17 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: array reference madness (2/5/1)+/- 2009-03-14 21:35 17 years ago
  
  [almut]
  - Re^2: array reference madness (1/2/1)+/- 2009-03-14 21:44 17 years ago
    
    [Porculus]
    - Re^3: array reference madness [8](1)+/- 2009-03-14 22:42 17 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
      - Re^4: array reference madness [2] 2009-03-15 07:03 17 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
Returning negative milliseconds with Time::Format (A:2/3/1)+/- 2009-03-14 20:23 17 years ago

[CColin]
- Re: Returning negative milliseconds with Time::Format (1)+/- 2009-03-14 21:31 17 years ago
  
  [codeacrobat]
  - Re^2: Returning negative milliseconds with Time::Format 2009-03-16 01:19 17 years ago
    
    [CColin]
Redirecting stdout with threads (A:1/3/2)+/- 2009-03-14 13:13 17 years ago

[michi]
- Re: Redirecting stdout with threads (1/2)+/- 2009-03-14 15:57 17 years ago
  
  [kennethk]
  - Re^2: Redirecting stdout with threads (1)+/- 2009-03-15 14:54 17 years ago
    
    [michi]
    - Re^3: Redirecting stdout with threads 2009-03-15 15:37 17 years ago
      
      [kennethk]
How I'm sure syswrite has finished? (A:4/14/1)+/- 2009-03-14 11:58 17 years ago

[casiano]
- Re: How I'm sure syswrite has finished? (2/5/1)+/- 2009-03-14 18:47 17 years ago
  
  [perl5ever]
  - Re: How I'm sure syswrite has finished? (1/2/1)+/- 2009-03-14 19:54 17 years ago
    
    [ikegami]
    - Re^2: How I'm sure syswrite has finished? (1)+/- 2009-03-14 22:18 17 years ago
      
      [casiano]
      - Re^3: How I'm sure syswrite has finished? [0] 2009-03-15 20:54 17 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
Behavior Driven Development: suggested tools for perl? (A:2/8/1)+/- 2009-03-13 18:16 17 years ago

[blogical]
- Re: Behavior Driven Development: suggested tools for perl? (1/2) 2009-03-15 11:41 17 years ago
  
  [ELISHEVA]
Why do I get a "used only once" warning here? (FA:9/28/1)+/- 2009-03-13 11:37 17 years ago

[rovf]
- Re: Why do I get a "used only once" warning here? (1/3) 2009-03-15 04:05 17 years ago
  
  [repellent]
Weird string (A:5/6/1)+/- 2009-03-13 09:30 17 years ago

[AoZus]
- Re: Weird string (1)+/- 2009-03-13 17:26 17 years ago
  
  [johngg]
  - Re^2: Weird string 2009-03-16 00:54 17 years ago
    
    [AoZus]
verilog perl usage (A:1/10/3)+/- 2009-02-25 19:25 17 years ago

[perlvoyager]
- Re: verilog perl usage (2/9/3)+/- 2009-02-25 21:56 17 years ago
  
  [toolic]
  - Re^2: verilog perl usage (1/5/3)+/- 2009-03-14 05:43 17 years ago
    
    [mahurshi]
    - Re^3: verilog perl usage (Verilog::Netlist) (1/4/3)+/- 2009-03-15 01:31 17 years ago
      
      [toolic]
      - Re^4: verilog perl usage (Verilog::Netlist) (2/3/2)+/- 2009-03-15 06:14 17 years ago
        
        [mahurshi]
        
        Re^5: verilog perl usage (Verilog::Netlist) (1)+/- 2009-03-15 14:13 17 years ago
        
        [toolic]
        
        Re^6: verilog perl usage (Verilog::Netlist) [0] 2009-03-15 18:53 17 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
Practical Text Mining with Perl: Good/Bad? (FA:4/5/1)+/- 2008-08-05 06:28 17 years ago

[PetaMem]
- Re: Practical Text Mining with Perl: Good/Bad? (1)+/- 2008-11-19 10:57 17 years ago
  
  [tomfahle]
  - Re^2: Practical Text Mining with Perl: Good/Bad? [0] 2009-03-16 00:24 17 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]

+/-Meditations (Top)

Sweating the small stuff: a lesson in optimisation (FA) 2009-03-16 00:06 17 years ago

[Porculus]
Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules (FA:15/36/6)+/- 2009-03-12 15:46 17 years ago

[bellaire]
- Re: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules (2/4)+/- 2009-03-15 11:21 17 years ago
  
  [Erez]
  - Re^2: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules 2009-03-15 12:28 17 years ago
    
    [JavaFan]
  - Re^2: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules (1/2)+/- 2009-03-15 16:34 17 years ago
    
    [bellaire]
    - Re^3: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules (1)+/- 2009-03-15 17:35 17 years ago
      
      [JavaFan]
      - Re^4: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules 2009-03-15 17:40 17 years ago
        
        [bellaire]
- Re: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules 2009-03-15 13:08 17 years ago
  
  [codeacrobat]
Perl is sinking (TIOBE): all time low for Perl (A:9/25/1)+/- 2009-03-08 12:47 17 years ago

[larus]
- Re: Perl is sinking (TIOBE): all time low for Perl (2/4/1)+/- 2009-03-08 18:59 17 years ago
  
  [larus]
  - Re^2: Perl is sinking (*****): all time low for Perl (1/2/1)+/- 2009-03-08 19:37 17 years ago
    
    [Gavin]
    - Re^3: Perl is sinking (TIOBE): all time low for Perl (1)+/- 2009-03-09 01:48 17 years ago
      
      [jasonk]
      - Re^4: Perl is sinking (*****): all time low for Perl 2009-03-15 11:39 17 years ago
        
        [Gavin]

+/-Cool Uses For Perl (Top)

Work around a bug in Apple Keynote '09 (FA:3/4/1)+/- 2009-03-13 13:39 17 years ago

[merlyn]
- Re: Work around a bug in Apple Keynote '09 2009-03-15 23:25 17 years ago
  
  [graff]

+/-Polls (Top)

Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (34/66/20)+/- 2009-03-15 11:48 17 years ago

[talexb]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 12:15 17 years ago
  
  [ww]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 12:19 17 years ago
  
  [Gavin]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (2/4/3)+/- 2009-03-15 12:33 17 years ago
  
  [bradcathey]
  - Re^2: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (2)+/- 2009-03-15 14:36 17 years ago
    
    [Lawliet]
    - Re^3: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 18:33 17 years ago
      
      [Gavin]
    - Re^3: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? [15] 2009-03-15 23:28 17 years ago
      
      [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 12:33 17 years ago
  
  [shmem]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 12:46 17 years ago
  
  [Old_Gray_Bear]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (2/4/2)+/- 2009-03-15 13:41 17 years ago
  
  [dreadpiratepeter]
  - Re^2: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (1/2/1)+/- 2009-03-15 16:28 17 years ago
    
    [grinder]
    - Re^3: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (1) 2009-03-15 17:41 17 years ago
      
      [Your Mother]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 13:56 17 years ago
  
  [codeacrobat]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (2/1)+/- 2009-03-15 14:15 17 years ago
  
  [apl]
  - Re^2: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 16:44 17 years ago
    
    [almut]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? (1) 2009-03-15 14:39 17 years ago
  
  [targetsmart]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 15:22 17 years ago
  
  [zentara]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 18:22 17 years ago
  
  [Illuminatus]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 23:31 17 years ago
  
  [johngg]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-15 23:37 17 years ago
  
  [Bloodnok]
- Re: Which bad behaviour most deserves an electric shock? 2009-03-16 03:33 17 years ago
  
  [talexb]

+/-Users (Top)

uskidsknow 2009-03-15 17:30 17 years ago
incognito129 2009-03-15 09:15 17 years ago

+/-Legend (Top)

Title [^1](AC:3/9/7)+/- [author]

Means: You "^"=up- or "v"=down-voted, "1"=reputation; "AC" from ( Front-paged, Approved, Unapproved, Considered, or link to Parent or Root ); Replies: "3" direct, "9" descendents, "7" recent, "+/-" shows/hides(uses javascript)

View Full Documentation, Show Legend at Top

Page Settings