Recently Active Threads

Viewing Nodes As of:	<<<<	<<<	<<	<	2020-08-10	>	>>	>>>	>>>>

+/-Questions (Top)

Surface fitting with PDL (A:2/4/2)+/- 2020-08-09 17:42 5 years ago

[Xilman]
- Re: Surface fitting with PDL 2020-08-09 18:47 5 years ago
  
  [jo37]
- Re: Surface fitting with PDL (2)+/- 2020-08-09 21:17 5 years ago
  
  [pryrt]
  - Re^2: Surface fitting with PDL 2020-08-10 07:29 5 years ago
    
    [Xilman]
  - Re^2: Surface fitting with PDL 2022-04-21 07:23 4 years ago
    
    [etj]
Multiline search and replace in file(s) (A:2)+/- 2020-08-09 05:57 5 years ago

[g_speran]
- Re: Multiline search and replace in file(s) 2020-08-09 08:03 5 years ago
  
  [haukex]
- Re: Multiline search and replace in file(s) 2020-08-09 08:18 5 years ago
  
  [AnomalousMonk]
Generalizing a REGEX [4](FA:2/4/1)+/- 2020-08-08 18:55 5 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Generalizing a REGEX 2020-08-08 19:02 5 years ago
  
  [haukex]
- Re: Generalizing a REGEX (2/1)+/- 2020-08-08 19:33 5 years ago
  
  [davido]
  - Re^2: Generalizing a REGEX [3] 2020-08-08 22:41 5 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: Generalizing a REGEX [7] 2020-08-09 16:36 5 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
XML::LibXML::XPathContext->string_value - should ALL of the descendant's text be there? (FA:1/4/1)+/- 2020-08-08 02:52 5 years ago

[bobn]
- Re: XML::LibXML::XPathContext->string_value - should ALL of the descendant's text be there? (1/3/1)+/- 2020-08-08 07:25 5 years ago
  
  [haukex]
  - Re^2: XML::LibXML::XPathContext->string_value - should ALL of the descendant's text be there? (1/2/1)+/- 2020-08-09 00:11 5 years ago
    
    [bobn]
    - Re^3: XML::LibXML::XPathContext->string_value - should ALL of the descendant's text be there? (1)+/- 2020-08-09 08:27 5 years ago
      
      [haukex]
      - Re^4: XML::LibXML::XPathContext->string_value - should ALL of the descendant's text be there? 2020-08-10 06:01 5 years ago
        
        [bobn]
Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (A:4/22/5)+/- 2020-08-07 12:29 5 years ago

[Lady_Aleena]
- Re: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (1)+/- 2020-08-07 12:37 5 years ago
  
  [hippo]
  - Re^2: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? 2020-08-07 13:04 5 years ago
    
    [Lady_Aleena]
- Re: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (1/4)+/- 2020-08-07 13:03 5 years ago
  
  [choroba]
  - Re^2: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (2/3)+/- 2020-08-07 14:30 5 years ago
    
    [Lady_Aleena]
    - Re^3: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (1)+/- 2020-08-07 14:34 5 years ago
      
      [choroba]
      - Re^4: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? 2020-08-07 23:18 5 years ago
        
        [Lady_Aleena]
    - Re^3: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? 2020-08-07 16:49 5 years ago
      
      [AnomalousMonk]
- Re: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? [-X](1)+/- 2020-08-08 02:55 5 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - Re^2: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? [-X] 2020-08-08 18:55 5 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (3/12/5)+/- 2020-08-09 00:33 5 years ago
  
  [Lady_Aleena]
  - Re^2: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) (1/7/5)+/- 2020-08-09 01:15 5 years ago
    
    [AnomalousMonk]
    - Re^3: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) (2/6/5)+/- 2020-08-09 02:11 5 years ago
      
      [Lady_Aleena]
      - Re^4: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) (1/2)+/- 2020-08-09 02:29 5 years ago
        
        [jcb]
        
        Re^5: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) (1)+/- 2020-08-09 08:28 5 years ago
        
        [dave_the_m]
        
        Re^6: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) 2020-08-09 08:35 5 years ago
        
        [dave_the_m]
      - Re^4: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) (1/2)+/- 2020-08-09 08:29 5 years ago
        
        [AnomalousMonk]
        
        Re^5: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) (1)+/- 2020-08-09 18:18 5 years ago
        
        [Lady_Aleena]
        
        Re^6: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (updated) 2020-08-09 19:01 5 years ago
        
        [AnomalousMonk]
  - Re^2: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? 2020-08-10 12:09 5 years ago
    
    [karlgoethebier]
  - Re^2: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? (2)+/- 2020-08-10 15:04 5 years ago
    
    [AnomalousMonk]
    - Re^3: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? 2020-08-10 16:12 5 years ago
      
      [Lady_Aleena]
    - Re^3: Should I worry about "Inappropriate ioctl for device"? 2020-08-10 20:07 5 years ago
      
      [Lady_Aleena]
Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated) (A:4/77/6)+/- 2020-08-04 17:18 5 years ago

[LanX]
- Re: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2)+/- 2020-08-05 01:45 5 years ago
  
  [Fletch]
  - Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 02:04 5 years ago
    
    [LanX]
  - Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 17:13 5 years ago
    
    [LanX]
- Re: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/16)+/- 2020-08-05 01:52 5 years ago
  
  [jcb]
  - Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? (3/8)+/- 2020-08-05 02:01 5 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1)+/- 2020-08-05 02:27 5 years ago
      
      [Fletch]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 13:40 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1)+/- 2020-08-05 17:28 5 years ago
      
      [chromatic]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 17:32 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/3)+/- 2020-08-05 21:43 5 years ago
      
      [jcb]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/2)+/- 2020-08-05 21:50 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1)+/- 2020-08-05 22:13 5 years ago
        
        [jcb]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 22:21 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
  - Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/6)+/- 2020-08-05 19:13 5 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/5)+/- 2020-08-05 21:48 5 years ago
      
      [jcb]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/4)+/- 2020-08-05 21:56 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/2)+/- 2020-08-05 22:01 5 years ago
        
        [jcb]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1)+/- 2020-08-05 22:11 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 22:18 5 years ago
        
        [jcb]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 22:07 5 years ago
        
        [hippo]
- Re: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/39)+/- 2020-08-05 09:39 5 years ago
  
  [haj]
  - Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/38)+/- 2020-08-05 11:41 5 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/17)+/- 2020-08-05 14:59 5 years ago
      
      [haj]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/16)+/- 2020-08-05 15:54 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/4)+/- 2020-08-05 17:58 5 years ago
        
        [haj]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/3)+/- 2020-08-05 18:03 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2)+/- 2020-08-05 18:43 5 years ago
        
        [haj]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 18:57 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-08 08:28 5 years ago
        
        [karlgoethebier]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/10)+/- 2020-08-05 18:11 5 years ago
        
        [jo37]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/9)+/- 2020-08-05 18:20 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/8)+/- 2020-08-05 18:40 5 years ago
        
        [jo37]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/7)+/- 2020-08-05 18:53 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/6)+/- 2020-08-05 19:21 5 years ago
        
        [jo37]
        
        Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (UPDATED) (1/4)+/- 2020-08-05 19:31 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/3)+/- 2020-08-05 19:48 5 years ago
        
        [jo37]
        
        Re^12: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/2)+/- 2020-08-05 20:18 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^13: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1)+/- 2020-08-06 07:15 5 years ago
        
        [jo37]
        
        Re^14: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-07 12:23 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 20:30 5 years ago
        
        [haukex]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/19)+/- 2020-08-05 17:33 5 years ago
      
      [dave_the_m]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/6)+/- 2020-08-05 17:56 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (2/5)+/- 2020-08-05 18:32 5 years ago
        
        [dave_the_m]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 18:44 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/3)+/- 2020-08-05 20:29 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (2)+/- 2020-08-05 20:49 5 years ago
        
        [haukex]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 21:11 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? 2020-08-05 21:16 5 years ago
        
        [Fletch]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/11)+/- 2020-08-05 18:30 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (1/10)+/- 2020-08-05 18:38 5 years ago
        
        [dave_the_m]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/9)+/- 2020-08-05 18:51 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (2/8)+/- 2020-08-05 21:20 5 years ago
        
        [dave_the_m]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (2/6)+/- 2020-08-05 21:35 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/3)+/- 2020-08-06 00:41 5 years ago
        
        [chromatic]
        
        Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/2)+/- 2020-08-06 01:35 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1)+/- 2020-08-06 05:26 5 years ago
        
        [chromatic]
        
        Re^12: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) 2020-08-06 11:57 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1)+/- 2020-08-06 08:51 5 years ago
        
        [dave_the_m]
        
        Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) 2020-08-06 12:26 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) 2020-08-05 21:41 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
- Re: Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated) (1/15/6)+/- 2020-08-06 04:12 5 years ago
  
  [ikegami]
  - Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/14/6)+/- 2020-08-06 12:08 5 years ago
    
    [LanX]
    - Re^3: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/13/6)+/- 2020-08-07 01:03 5 years ago
      
      [ikegami]
      - Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/12/6)+/- 2020-08-07 01:19 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/11/6)+/- 2020-08-07 10:34 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/10/6)+/- 2020-08-07 19:54 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/9/6)+/- 2020-08-08 01:17 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (2/8/5)+/- 2020-08-09 06:55 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) 2020-08-09 07:12 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (2/6/3)+/- 2020-08-09 12:46 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1)+/- 2020-08-09 21:07 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) 2020-08-09 23:45 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]
        
        Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/3)+/- 2020-08-09 21:19 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1/2)+/- 2020-08-10 06:08 5 years ago
        
        [Corion]
        
        Re^12: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) (1)+/- 2020-08-11 10:39 5 years ago
        
        [ikegami]
        
        Re^13:Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) 2020-08-11 15:13 5 years ago
        
        [LanX]

Means: You "^"=up- or "v"=down-voted, "1"=reputation; "AC" from ( Front-paged, Approved, Unapproved, Considered, or link to Parent or Root ); Replies: "3" direct, "9" descendents, "7" recent, "+/-" shows/hides(uses javascript)

View Full Documentation, Show Legend at Top

+/-Questions (Top)

+/-Legend (Top)

Page Settings