in reply to Re^7: RFC: Better Best Answers (double down identity reveal endorsement)
in thread RFC: Better Best Answers
What about a double down identity reveal? Like an endorsement
Cool idea! But I'm ambivalent about it. On one hand, some people might sometimes like the endorsement aspect. On the other hand, I suspect most monks will mostly prefer to keep their voting anonymous; in which case, this obligatory identity reveal will be seen as a cost, and thus will be a disincentive. It would suppress the exercise of the feature. I'm not looking for ways to undermine the efficacy of the new feature. :-)
What if, instead, we were to let any voting action be accompanied by a voluntary option to reveal identity?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^9: RFC: Better Best Answers (double down identity reveal endorsement)
by hippo (Archbishop) on Sep 15, 2016 at 12:51 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 15, 2016 at 13:42 UTC | |
by hippo (Archbishop) on Sep 15, 2016 at 14:02 UTC |