Re^9: RFC: Better Best Answers (double down identity reveal endorsement)

this obligatory identity reveal will be seen as a cost, and thus will be a disincentive.

I think that's part of the charm of it. You an upvote once anonymously as at present but if you think it's a really great node and don't mind others knowing you think that then you can give it the bonus. Sounds ideal to me.

Comment on Re^9: RFC: Better Best Answers (double down identity reveal endorsement)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: RFC: Better Best Answers (double down identity reveal endorsement) by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 15, 2016 at 13:42 UTC
Who's name is displayed if more than one person doubles down on the same post? Or would you want a list? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :) In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^11: RFC: Better Best Answers (double down identity reveal endorsement) by hippo (Archbishop) on Sep 15, 2016 at 14:02 UTC
A list would be fine. It wouldn't have to be fully displayed in the normal view - the node could simply have a "some monks have double-voted this" message as a link to the list of names.	[reply]